2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimethodological validation of the modified fatigue impact scale in a Danish population of people with Multiple Sclerosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the LEFS score increased from 26/80 (32.5%) to 39/80 (48.8%), indicating an improvement in the patient's physical activity level, as observed in her walking, balancing, and stair climbing. Improvements in the MFIS and LEFS suggested enhanced functional abilities, especially in the LEs [30], and improved quality of life for the patient [30,31].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, the LEFS score increased from 26/80 (32.5%) to 39/80 (48.8%), indicating an improvement in the patient's physical activity level, as observed in her walking, balancing, and stair climbing. Improvements in the MFIS and LEFS suggested enhanced functional abilities, especially in the LEs [30], and improved quality of life for the patient [30,31].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The items on the MFIS address the impact of fatigue on the patient's physical, cognitive, and psychosocial well-being. The MFIS possesses good structural, cross-cultural, and nomological validity and is suitable for multidimensional Rasch analysis [31].…”
Section: Tests and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this finding is of uncertain clinical significance because, according to recent studies, the psychosocial subscale of the MFIS has a low factor loading in exploratory factor analysis of MFIS, as well as low reliability, and should not be interpreted independently of the other subscales. 45 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A score of ≥38 points indicates clinical fatigue [ 110 ], and a change of 4 points is considered clinically relevant [ 111 ]. The Danish version of MFIS has been validated and shows good reliability [ 112 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%