2009
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/698/2/1054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimessenger Model for the Starburst Galaxy M82

Abstract: In this paper, a consistent model of the multifrequency emission of the starburst galaxy M82, from radio to gamma-rays is presented and discussed. Predictions for observations with Fermi, MAGIC II/VERITAS and CTA telescopes are made. The model is also used to self-consistenty compute the (all flavors) emission of neutrinos resulting from this starburst galaxy, what can be used in considerations of the diffuse contributions of such objects.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

16
99
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
16
99
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These include the detection of three nearby starburst galaxies, NGC 253, NGC 3034 (M 82), and NGC 5945, in the GeV (Ackermann et al 2012) and TeV (Acero et al 2009;Acciari et al 2009;Lenain et al 2010) regions. Measured fluxes from these galaxies agree with earlier theoretical predictions (NGC 253: Domingo-Santamaría & Torres 2005;Rephaeli et al 2010;NGC 3034: Persic et al 2008;de Cea et al 2009;NGC 4945: Lenain et al 2010) based on convection-diffusion models for proton and electron propagation and energy losses. While there were appreciable differences in the models treated in those works, predicted values for U p in the SBNs of the three galaxies were around 250 eV cm −3 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These include the detection of three nearby starburst galaxies, NGC 253, NGC 3034 (M 82), and NGC 5945, in the GeV (Ackermann et al 2012) and TeV (Acero et al 2009;Acciari et al 2009;Lenain et al 2010) regions. Measured fluxes from these galaxies agree with earlier theoretical predictions (NGC 253: Domingo-Santamaría & Torres 2005;Rephaeli et al 2010;NGC 3034: Persic et al 2008;de Cea et al 2009;NGC 4945: Lenain et al 2010) based on convection-diffusion models for proton and electron propagation and energy losses. While there were appreciable differences in the models treated in those works, predicted values for U p in the SBNs of the three galaxies were around 250 eV cm −3 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Secondary electrons (and positrons, produced in π ± decays following pp collisions) initially have a slightly flatter spectrum (by Δq 0.2) than the parent proton spectrum for energies 1 GeV, but then their spectrum steepens due to severe energy losses. Detailed numerical models of emission from starburst galaxies show that primary and secondary electrons have roughly similar spectral shapes at energies ∼10 MeV-1 TeV (e.g., Domingo-Santamaría & Torres 2005;De Cea del Pozo et al 2009;Rephaeli et al 2010). Therefore, in the relatively small SBN region, where energetic particles have not yet ventured out too far from their acceleration sites, it is quite reasonable (for our purposes here) to characterize their spectra with the same index.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulated Figure 9: Simulation of 30h CTA observations (array configuration I) for the starburst galaxy M82. The curves represents the predicted emission and the data points based on the measured spectrum from M82 and a spectral model of [82].…”
Section: Starburst Galaxies and Galaxy Clustermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…spectrum is based on the model presented in [82]. It is evident that, if present, a cutoff in the TeV energy range will be easily identified by CTA.…”
Section: Starburst Galaxies and Galaxy Clustermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, because the gamma rays are a recent discovery, our understanding of CRs is at a basic, phenomenological level. Thus, much of the theoretical work about CRs in starbursts uses one-zone steady-state models (Paglione et al 1996;Torres 2004;Domingo-Santamaría & Torres 2005;de Cea del Pozo et al 2009;Lacki et al 2010). These assume that the interstellar medium (ISM), magnetic fields, and CR injection of starbursts are completely homogeneous -essentially, that starbursts have no structure, which is obviously not true in detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%