1994 IEEE GLOBECOM. Communications: The Global Bridge
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.1994.512722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimedia servers-design and performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the video material is stored in a small number of centralized databases, called Video Servers or Video Libraries, characterized by high fault tolerance, high parallelism, and considerable storage capacity [13], [17], [19]- [21]. Each of these servers is controlled by a Level 2 Gateway, in charge of several service operation functions, such as billing, introduction of new video programs, privacy, and security [7], [8].…”
Section: Architectural Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the video material is stored in a small number of centralized databases, called Video Servers or Video Libraries, characterized by high fault tolerance, high parallelism, and considerable storage capacity [13], [17], [19]- [21]. Each of these servers is controlled by a Level 2 Gateway, in charge of several service operation functions, such as billing, introduction of new video programs, privacy, and security [7], [8].…”
Section: Architectural Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the analysis external arrivals are modeled as Poisson for each protocol model while in the simulation this assumption is only used for user initiated external call arrivals at the B-SSP (Bafutto, 1994), (Willmann, 1990), (Smith, 1994), (Lekkou). For the B-VoD service we assume movies with a mean length of 110 minutes (Ghafir, 1994). Users either watch the whole movie (i.e.…”
Section: System Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the video/media server, a suitable combination of distributed processor, fast interconnection network/bus, redundant arrays of independent disks (RAID) and high-speed, ATM-network interface hardware will generally be required to support a large number of simultaneous video channels. Architectures for video servers (Ghafir and Chadwick 1994;Hui et al 1995) are still evolving, and most will require new hardware modules and parallel processing to overcome existing performance bottlenecks. On the terminal side, current PC hardware is adequate for low-speed Standard Interchange Format (SIF) MPEG-1-type applications in the range of 1.5-4 Mbits/s, while typical UNIX workstations have I/O capabilities up to about 10 Mbits/s.…”
Section: System Architecture Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%