2003
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45113-7_24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimedia Search with Pseudo-relevance Feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
132
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
132
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The images reranking methods can be classified into that of classification based [12,25], clustering based [2,3,4,7,14], graph based [8,16], and learning to rerank [22,26,27].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The images reranking methods can be classified into that of classification based [12,25], clustering based [2,3,4,7,14], graph based [8,16], and learning to rerank [22,26,27].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative samples are selected from the images in the bottom of the rank list or from other queries's results. Then a classifier is trained using these positive and negative samples [25]. And the images in the initial list are classified and reranked using the trained classifier.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, Yan et al [9] train SVMs whose positive training data are from the query examples, while negative training data are from negative pseudo relevance feedback; however, in the scenario of query by keyword, positive training data is hard to obtain. And Lin et al [10] propose a relevance model to calculate the relevance of each image, which evaluates the relevance of the HTML document linking to the image; however, this model depends on the documents returned by a text web search engine, which may be totally irrelevant with the retrieved images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%