2013 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icme.2013.6607623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multimedia implicit tagging using EEG signals

Abstract: Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals reflect brain activities associated with emotional and cognitive processes. In this paper, we demonstrate how they can be used to find tags for multimedia content without users' direct input. Alternative methods for multimedia tagging is attracting increasing interest from multimedia community. The new portable EEG helmets are paving the way for employing brain waves in human computer interaction. In this paper, we demonstrate the performance of EEG for tagging purposes using… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The best subject independent classification rate was obtained using only eye gaze whose classification rate is 59.5% with the average F1 score of 0.59. This is superior to the average subject dependent results reported in [5,12,14] and in the same line with the subject dependent results reported in [3] using eye gaze, the best F1 score reported was 0.6. It is worth noting that a subject independent approach is more useful in practice due to the higher chance of generalizing over a population.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The best subject independent classification rate was obtained using only eye gaze whose classification rate is 59.5% with the average F1 score of 0.59. This is superior to the average subject dependent results reported in [5,12,14] and in the same line with the subject dependent results reported in [3] using eye gaze, the best F1 score reported was 0.6. It is worth noting that a subject independent approach is more useful in practice due to the higher chance of generalizing over a population.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Welch's overlapped segment averaging estimator is then used to estimate the PSD of each EEG band, using a 256 samples window with an overlap of 128 samples. The logarithms of the PSD from each of the aforementioned bands are extracted from the signal of each of the 14 electrodes in order to be used as features, as also proposed in [1], [11], [12], [37], leading to a total of 42 features (3 for each of the 14 electrodes). Finally, all the features are concatenated into the final feature vector F EEG as follows: Let F iθ , F iα , and F iβ be the logarithm of the PSD for the signal of the i-th electrode, i = 1, 2, ..., 14, for the theta, alpha and beta bands respectively.…”
Section: B Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In-sensor signal compression could vastly reduce the transmission bandwidth. Conventional compression methods such as average downsampling [7] and uniform downsampling [8] are substantially limited by the Nyquist sampling rate, and the compressed data can not be reconstructed afterward. Compressive sensing (CS) has been proposed to compress signals at a sub-Nyquist sampling rate in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%