2003
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multilocus statistics to uncover epistasis and heterogeneity in complex diseases: revisiting a set of multiple sclerosis data

Abstract: New statistics are developed to gather the contribution of many alleles at different loci to common diseases. Both inferential and descriptive statistics are included in order to uncover epistatic effects as well as heterogeneity. The problem of multiple testing is circumvented by considering a global null hypothesis. Global testing is supplemented by descriptive methods that make use of measures like odds ratio or the Pvalue of individually tested allele combinations. Visualization helps to reflect complex da… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The upper bounds used in these methods do not work for other statistical tests, such as chi-square test, G-test, information-theoretic association measurements, and trend test (Balding (2006); Pagano and Gauvreau (2000); Thomas (2004)), which are also routinely used by researchers. In addition, new statistics for epistasis detection are continually emerging in the literature (Bohringer et al (2003); Dong and et al (2008); Zhao et al (2005)). Therefore, it is desirable to develop a general model that supports a variety of statistical tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upper bounds used in these methods do not work for other statistical tests, such as chi-square test, G-test, information-theoretic association measurements, and trend test (Balding (2006); Pagano and Gauvreau (2000); Thomas (2004)), which are also routinely used by researchers. In addition, new statistics for epistasis detection are continually emerging in the literature (Bohringer et al (2003); Dong and et al (2008); Zhao et al (2005)). Therefore, it is desirable to develop a general model that supports a variety of statistical tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%