Multilevel Quality Improvement Teams: An Alternative Approach for Surgical Academic Training Programs to Meet ACGME Core Competency Milestones

Hajjar-Nejad, M.J.; Kubicki, Natalia; Morales, David; Kavic, Stephen M.

doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.10.006

Cited by 3 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In total, 24 articles employed quantitative methods, 1,3,4,7,10,34,36,37,39,40,42,88-100 3 were qualitative, 101-103 5 used mixed methods, 9,38,45,104,105 8 were literature reviews, 2,8,11,18,31,35,106,107 5 were perspective papers, 6,30,32,33,43 3 were descriptive in nature, 41,44,108 and 2 were systematic reviews. 5,109 Nineteen studies in-volved mentees only, 3,4,32,36,40,42,45,88,90,92,94-96,98,99,…”

Section: Stage 4: Data Characterisation and Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Lack of institutional support 1,3,8,10,11,18,[34][35][36][37]39,41,[90][91][92]95,97,98,104,[107][108][109] Poor access to trained mentors 1,4,5,18,[35][36][37][38][39]90,91,95,97,102,104,107,108 Poor access to same-sex mentors 1,2,5,7,9,11,18,31,35,36,40,91,100,105,…”

Section: Role Of Host Organisationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Identify a number of people with the skills and motivation to be mentors, personality and enthusiasm for the process, thereby creating a pool from which to draw on 8 3. Co-mentoring, peer-group mentoring, and long-distance mentoring can be successful when clear roles and goals are established for each mentor relationship 11,107,108 4. near-peer mentoring can be suitable to mentor individuals through social, teaching, and academic activities 94 5. Provide performance improvement and continuing medical education credits to faculty as incentives to mentor research activities 108 Lack of same-sex mentors 1.…”

Section: Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Institution to provide economic support for mentorship programme 10,105 11. Protected time for mentoring 1,34,36,96,97,100,103,104,108 Imbalance between self-identification and formal assignment of mentors 1. Adopting a mixed approach to matching 2,3,7,31,36 2.…”

Section: Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Provide students shadowing opportunities and chances to assist in operating rooms to broaden professional network 107 7. Social media can serve as a valuable tool to enhance networking of mentees in seeking mentorship 91 Lack of time [1][2][3][4][5][7][8][9]11,18,34,36,38,39,45,[88][89][90]97,98,103,104,108,109 Culture and sex differences 2,5,11,18,101 Generational gaps 5,11,18,42,98 Power differences inherent within surgical specialities 10,34,42 Personality conflicts 9,11,36,39,41,43,44,91,98,107 Overstepping boundaries 2,11,31,100 Table 5. Proposed solutions to ethical issue...…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

A Systematic Scoping Review of Ethical Issues in Mentoring in Surgery

Lee

Chua

Cheong

et al. 2019

Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Mentoring is crucial to the growth and development of mentors, mentees, and host organisations. Yet, the process of mentoring in surgery is poorly understood and increasingly mired in ethical concerns that compromise the quality of mentorship and prevent mentors, mentees, and host organisations from maximising its full potential. A systematic scoping review was undertaken to map the ethical issues in surgical mentoring to enhance understanding, assessment, and guidance on ethical conduct. Methods: Arksey and O’Malley’s methodological framework was used to guide a systematic scoping review involving articles published between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2018 in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ERIC, ScienceDirect, Mednar, and OpenGrey databases. Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis approach was adopted to compare ethical issues in surgical mentoring across different settings, mentee and mentor populations, and host organisations. Results: A total of 3849 abstracts were identified, 464 full-text articles were retrieved, and 50 articles were included. The 3 themes concerned ethical lapses at the levels of mentor or mentee, mentoring relationships, and host organisation. Conclusions: Mentoring abuse in surgery involves lapses in conduct, understanding of roles and responsibilities, poor alignment of expectations, and a lack of clear standards of practice. It is only with better structuring of mentoring processes and effective support of host organisation tasked with providing timely, longitudinal, and holistic assessment and oversight will surgical mentoring overcome prevailing ethical concerns surrounding it.

show abstract

Section: Stage 4: Data Characterisation and Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Role Of Host Organisationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Recommendationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A Systematic Scoping Review of Ethical Issues in Mentoring in Surgery

Lee

Chua

Cheong

et al. 2019

Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis: Determinants of the Effectiveness and Sustainability of Measurement-Focused Quality Improvement Trainings

Khurshid

Brún

Martin

et al. 2021

J Contin Educ Health Prof

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The ability of health care professionals to measure change is critical for successful quality improvement (QI) efforts. Currently, there are no systematic reviews focusing on continuing education for health care professionals in data skills for QI. The purpose of this systematic review is to define effectiveness and sustainability of QI programs for health care professionals containing a measurement skills component and to identify barriers and facilitators to effectiveness and sustainability. Methods: The systematic review involved study identification, screening, full text review, and data extraction. Four electronics databases and grey literature sources were searched to identify studies published between 2009 and 2019 (11 years). A customized data extraction form was developed. Mixed methods appraisal tool was used for quality assessment and a thematic analysis was conducted for narrative synthesis. Results: Fifty-three studies from 11 countries were included. Most study designs were quantitative descriptive (17/53) and used a blended learning approach (25/53) combining face-to face and distance learning modes. The programs included basic, intermediate, and advanced data skills concepts. Overall, studies reported positive outcomes for participant reaction, learning, and behavior, but reported variable success in sustainability and spread of QI. Discussion: Studies discussed measurement as a key competency for clinical QI. Effectiveness definitions focused on the short-term impact of the programs, whereas sustainability definitions emphasized maintenance of outcomes and skills in the long-term. Factors that influenced effectiveness and sustainability of the included studies were strategic approach to QI, organizational support, intervention design, communication, accountability, leadership support, and learning networks.

show abstract

Quality Evaluation Model of Education in Remote Learning and IoT Based on College Students’ Quality Cultivation

Huang

Wang

2022

Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The current model for evaluating ideological and political education is mostly based on a weighted evaluation of related educational parameters, like the structure of the school and the structure of the teachers. In this cycle, the impact of college students’ general development on the construction of their ideological and political education is not considered, which makes evaluations less exact by and large. To work on the exactness of the evaluation model, you ought to upgrade the construction of the evaluation model, with the quality of education for college students as the center advancement. Education quality evaluation calculation and model parameter output calculation are integrated. In terms of the quality of training for college students, simulation tests reveal that the proposed model has the lowest blunder esteem and the highest general evaluation precision. This makes it easier to decide what kind of ideological and political education is best.

show abstract

Multilevel Quality Improvement Teams: An Alternative Approach for Surgical Academic Training Programs to Meet ACGME Core Competency Milestones

Cited by 3 publications

References 12 publications

A Systematic Scoping Review of Ethical Issues in Mentoring in Surgery

A Systematic Scoping Review of Ethical Issues in Mentoring in Surgery

A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis: Determinants of the Effectiveness and Sustainability of Measurement-Focused Quality Improvement Trainings

Quality Evaluation Model of Education in Remote Learning and IoT Based on College Students’ Quality Cultivation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About