2017
DOI: 10.1137/17m1111553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multilevel Particle Filters

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper the filtering of partially observed diffusions, with discrete-time observations, is considered. It is assumed that only biased approximations of the diffusion can be obtained, for choice of an accuracy parameter indexed by l. A multilevel estimator is proposed, consisting of a telescopic sum of increment estimators associated to the successive levels. The work associated to O(ε 2 ) mean-square error between the multilevel estimator and average with respect to the filtering distribution … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
176
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
176
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ETPF, coupled with localization, allows one to simply and cheaply carry out a multilevel coupling between each fine and coarse ensemble in each independent Monte Carlo estimator in the MLMC framework. A recent study has also proposed a framework to apply MLMC to nonlinear filtering with a modified random resampling step in the standard particle filtering methodology to couple particles from coarse and fine levels [12]. In contrast, the coupling in the present paper is designed to minimize the Wasserstein distance between the distributions of these transformed ensembles (in the standard ETPF methodology), originally suggested in [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ETPF, coupled with localization, allows one to simply and cheaply carry out a multilevel coupling between each fine and coarse ensemble in each independent Monte Carlo estimator in the MLMC framework. A recent study has also proposed a framework to apply MLMC to nonlinear filtering with a modified random resampling step in the standard particle filtering methodology to couple particles from coarse and fine levels [12]. In contrast, the coupling in the present paper is designed to minimize the Wasserstein distance between the distributions of these transformed ensembles (in the standard ETPF methodology), originally suggested in [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sincev N n ,ỹ n ∈ ∩ r≥2 L r (Ω), inequalities (26) and (25) imply that v N,P n −v N n p (|I −K N n H| 2 + ỹ n − Hv N n 2p )P −1/2 + P −1 P −1/2 . The argument holds for any p ≥ 2, and the proof follows by induction.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These works were also the first to present L p convergence rates for weak approximations of MLEnKF in the large ensemble and finer numerical resolution limit. See [25,2,36,15,14,32,11] for recent contributions on multilevel methods in filtering.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also important to note that the pseudo-marginal approach is equally valid for Bayesian sampling strategies based on sequential Monte Carlo (Del Moral et al, 2006;Li et al, 2019;Sisson et al, 2007). Furthermore, advances in stochastic simulation (Schnoerr et al, 2017;Warne et al, 2019) can also improve the performance of the likelihood estimator, and the application of multilevel Monte Carlo to particle filters can further reduce estimator variance (Gregory et al, 2016;Jasra et al, 2017Jasra et al, , 2018.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%