2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2005.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multilevel modelling of land use from field to village level in the Philippines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
47
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
47
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Since our data structure is characterized by the observations of 443 small watersheds nested within two counties, it is not surprising that the variance of NPP is not significant at the county level. The relative small sample size at the county level may hamper the estimation of intercept random, which is similar to the conditions in previous studies (Overmars and Verburg, 2006;Polsky and Easterling III, 2001). Overall, there is not significant county level intercept variation and there is not significant improvement in Eq.…”
Section: Multilevel Modelingsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Since our data structure is characterized by the observations of 443 small watersheds nested within two counties, it is not surprising that the variance of NPP is not significant at the county level. The relative small sample size at the county level may hamper the estimation of intercept random, which is similar to the conditions in previous studies (Overmars and Verburg, 2006;Polsky and Easterling III, 2001). Overall, there is not significant county level intercept variation and there is not significant improvement in Eq.…”
Section: Multilevel Modelingsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In particular, the variances of the conditional models increased and became significant in the conditional model of b (1) compared with the unconditional model of a (1). Although the result could not be explained completely, this could partially be because the changes in the fixed effects part can generally cause significant change in the random part, while changes in the random part usually do not cause enormous change in the fixed effect part [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The analysis of hierarchical data is best performed using statistical techniques, such as multi-level modeling [43]. Until now, there have been several empirical studies in which multi-level modeling is used to deal with hierarchical data in rural studies [26,44,45]. In this study, the influence of village, household, and peasant-related factors on peasants' livelihood strategies was analyzed using multi-level modeling.…”
Section: Multi-level Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multilevel modeling approaches are useful for hierarchical data analysis whereby observations in a dataset belong in groups-such as land change within a single territoryand model parameters are jointly estimated by group, such as different groups of territories or urban clusters at different scales or locations. Multilevel models are being used by land-change scientists (58), but the research community has yet to realize fully the gains from incorporating multilevel modeling methods and approaches used in statistics (59). Spatially explicit life-cycle analysis.…”
Section: Research Agenda For Moving Forwardmentioning
confidence: 99%