1991
DOI: 10.1109/18.79944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multilevel error-control codes for data storage channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, an II code is not an optimal LRC code since its minimum distance does not achieve the bound given by (1). However, we will see that in some cases the minimum distance is not the crucial parameter in the performance of LRC codes, but the average number of erasures to data loss.…”
Section: Reading the Symbols Ofmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In general, an II code is not an optimal LRC code since its minimum distance does not achieve the bound given by (1). However, we will see that in some cases the minimum distance is not the crucial parameter in the performance of LRC codes, but the average number of erasures to data loss.…”
Section: Reading the Symbols Ofmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The first step to retrieve the erased entries consists of computing the rm+s syndromes. Using the parity-check matrix H(m, n, r, s; f (x)) given by (1), the syndromes are…”
Section: Code Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we assume that r = 1, thus, the parity-check matrix H(m, n, 1, s) given by (1) can be written as…”
Section: The Case R =mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We say that a block error happens if one or several small squares in a column of the array are altered. 1 In our setting, we think of the symbol errors and block errors as being caused by two different mechanisms. In this model, an observer cannot distinguish a block error from one or multiple symbol errors in the same column.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%