2021
DOI: 10.1109/tnnls.2020.3016321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multilevel Edge Features Guided Network for Image Denoising

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we conduct extensive experiments to demonstrate the performance of the proposed denoising algorithm (TSLR). In addition, we compare our algorithm with some exsiting non-deep denoising algorithms, including BM3D [6], NCSR [5], SAIST [34], WNNM [12], LIIC [15], RM [16], BMLSVDTV [25], DPID [47], and deep learning-based denoising algorithms (e.g., Dn-CNN [19], FFDNet [44] and MLEFGN [45]). Three test datasets are used to evaluate the AWGN variance σ ∈ {10, 15, 25, 30, 50, 100}.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this section, we conduct extensive experiments to demonstrate the performance of the proposed denoising algorithm (TSLR). In addition, we compare our algorithm with some exsiting non-deep denoising algorithms, including BM3D [6], NCSR [5], SAIST [34], WNNM [12], LIIC [15], RM [16], BMLSVDTV [25], DPID [47], and deep learning-based denoising algorithms (e.g., Dn-CNN [19], FFDNet [44] and MLEFGN [45]). Three test datasets are used to evaluate the AWGN variance σ ∈ {10, 15, 25, 30, 50, 100}.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is challenging for the denoising performance of non-deep methods to surpass that of deep learning-based methods. In this part, the proposed algorithm is compared with deep learning-based denoising algorithms (e.g., Dn-CNN [19], FFDNet [44] and MLEFGN [45]). The source codes of these methods are downloaded from the corresponding authors' websites, and we use the default parameter settings.…”
Section: Experimental Results Compared With Deep Learning-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, many CNN-based models Model Size Investigation on BSD68, Noise level=50 have been proposed for SID, especially for the Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN). Different from traditional methods, these methods [7,13,18,22,25,31,34,38] usually learn the mapping between noisy and clear images by building a well-designed CNN. For example, Zhang et al [38] proposed the first end-to-end trainable CNN model (DnCNN) for Gaussian denoising, which took the advantage of batch normalization and residual learning to recover clean images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%