The articles in this issue of are in four major groups, which deal with (a) basic psychological processes and conflict, (b) mental health and conflict, (c) psychology and conflict resolution, and (d) the relationship between psychology and the military.The articles in the first group explore basic psychological processes associated with forgiveness and collective guilt (Leonard, Yung, & Cairns, 2015), perceived threat (Billies, 2015), stereotypes (Mozumder & Haque, 2015), and attributions (Sammut, Bezzina, & Sartawi, 2015). Leonard et al. (2015) found that in the context of Northern Ireland, those who experienced collective guilt were more likely to be positively disposed toward outgroups. This relationship was present across religious groups, although the study also replicated the expected trend of Catholics identifying more strongly with their religious ingroup than did Protestants. Billies (2015) used qualitative narrative analysis to explore surveillance threat, in the context of heightened national security concerns in the United States. This study illuminated the very subtle changes experienced by minorities who are the targets of widespread "stop and frisk" policies, as security concerns become an increasingly salient national priority. The study by Billies makes clear that surveillance threats have costs and consequences, particularly for targeted minorities. The brief research report by Mozumder and Haque (2015) illuminates the important role of stereotypes in intergroup relations, with a focus on two groups living in southeastern Bangladesh. With a similar focus on basic cognitive processes, the brief research report by Sammut et al. (2015) explores intergroup attributions in the context of Malta.The second group of articles, which deal with mental health and conflict, begins with the timely examination by Suleiman and Agat-Galili (2015) of relationships between Israeli therapists and Arab patients. At the center of this relationship are issues of identity and identification, with macro intergroup conflicts and status inequalities seeping into interpersonal relationships in the therapy sessions. Individual therapists and mental health patients are not able to escape the larger conflicts pervading their societies, even when at the individual level they have the best of intentions to collaborate with one another. The second article in this group (Montiel, 2015) describes a personal 40-year journey by a highly insightful psychologist and prodemocracy activist living in the Philippines. Using the method of analytic autoethnography, the author examines the different layers of her experiences during the slow and painful transition out of dictatorship, moving toward a more open Philippine society. Like the discussion by Suleiman and Agat-Galili, Montiel's article highlights the complex relationship between macro and micro level psychological processes, and the challenges