2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7683(99)00190-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multilayer shells: Geometrically-exact formulation of equations of motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then the element assumed strainε is approximated as ε=Nα (10) where N is the interpolation function matrix for the element assumed strain, α is the vector composed of the corresponding undetermined generalized strain parameters. To prevent the spurious zero-strain energy mode, the number of the undetermined generalized strain parameters should be not less than the difference between the total number of nodal DOFs and the total number of the rigid body displacement.…”
Section: The Element Assumed Strain Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then the element assumed strainε is approximated as ε=Nα (10) where N is the interpolation function matrix for the element assumed strain, α is the vector composed of the corresponding undetermined generalized strain parameters. To prevent the spurious zero-strain energy mode, the number of the undetermined generalized strain parameters should be not less than the difference between the total number of nodal DOFs and the total number of the rigid body displacement.…”
Section: The Element Assumed Strain Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the discretization through the thickness direction should be similar with the mesh density in the in-plane direction due to the limitation of the element aspect ratio, resulting in much higher computational cost since the overall model composed of great many solid elements comprises million degrees of freedom. In contrast, the shell elements are computationally efficient [9][10][11], but most of shell elements are not able to accurately capture the interlaminar transverse shear stress and the transverse normal stress through the plate thickness direction, because these shell elements employ the common kinematic assumptions of inextensibility in the thickness direction or the zero transverse normal-stress condition etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, for the coordinate surface 2 = const, Vu-Quoc et al [21,22] employed the vectors {N } and {M } as the resultant variables. In terms of these variables, the equations of motion take a simpler form, as seen from Equation (84) in [21] and Equation (127) in [22].…”
Section: Mechanics Of Geometrically Exact Shellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of these variables, the equations of motion take a simpler form, as seen from Equation (84) in [21] and Equation (127) in [22].…”
Section: Mechanics Of Geometrically Exact Shellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical research for treating laminated thin structures has been widely developed (e.g., [1][2][3][4][5]). Depending on theories of laminated plates and shells, these methods are mainly valid for classical multilayer structures and do not account for complex multiphase morphologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%