1992
DOI: 10.1109/26.142798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multihop lightwave networks: a comparison of store-and-forward and hot-potato routing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Deflection routing can be used in these networks, but the performance of deflection routing with no buffering in networks not designed specifically for this method of routing is greatly reduced [34]. Both the omega and butterfly networks are simple and were designed for electrical store-and-forward routing.…”
Section: Butterfly and Omega Network Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deflection routing can be used in these networks, but the performance of deflection routing with no buffering in networks not designed specifically for this method of routing is greatly reduced [34]. Both the omega and butterfly networks are simple and were designed for electrical store-and-forward routing.…”
Section: Butterfly and Omega Network Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have been used in parallel machines such as the HEP multiprocessor [48], the Connection machine [27], and the Caltech Mosaic C [47], as well as in high speed communication networks [34]. Hot-potato routing is appropriate for optical networks [1,25,34,52,55].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Below, we adapt the discussion from [15, Section 2] so that it is appropriate for trees. Consider a packet that was deflected at time t 1 by packet 1 . Define a deflection sequence and a deflection path with respect to this deflection as follows.…”
Section: Deflection Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [1], let the network capacity C be defined as r·S·N c = --=-·-- (13) where r denotes the number of transceivers per node, S stands for the transmitting rate of each transmitter, N represents the number of nodes in the network, and h denotes the mean hop distance of the network. …”
Section: Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%