2019
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201902977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multifunctional Nanocomposites with High Strength and Capacitance Using 2D MXene and 1D Nanocellulose

Abstract: Structural electrode materials that integrate high mechanical strength and high electrochemical performances are attractive as they are indispensable for building lightweight, flexible electronics. [1][2][3] These materials should be able to withstand extreme mechanical stress and deformations while maintaining high charge storage properties, and thereby decrease the electrochemically inactive weight and volume for packaging of devices, especially in limited spaces. [1] Most conventional electrode materials, h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
250
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 268 publications
(260 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(74 reference statements)
10
250
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy density of m‐MSC is in the range of 10.3 to 29.6 mWh cm −3 with a corresponding power density in the range of 18.6 to 3.1 W cm −3 . Remarkably, these values are higher than lithium thin‐film batteries (<10 mWh cm −3 ), commercial super‐capacitors (5.5 V/100 mF), and reported MXene‐related MSCs like all‐MXene MSCs (18 mWh cm −3 ), MXene film MSCs (12.4 mWh cm −3 ), MXene/graphene (1.4 mWh cm −3 ), MXene/cellulose nanofiber (0.9 mWh cm −3 ), etc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The energy density of m‐MSC is in the range of 10.3 to 29.6 mWh cm −3 with a corresponding power density in the range of 18.6 to 3.1 W cm −3 . Remarkably, these values are higher than lithium thin‐film batteries (<10 mWh cm −3 ), commercial super‐capacitors (5.5 V/100 mF), and reported MXene‐related MSCs like all‐MXene MSCs (18 mWh cm −3 ), MXene film MSCs (12.4 mWh cm −3 ), MXene/graphene (1.4 mWh cm −3 ), MXene/cellulose nanofiber (0.9 mWh cm −3 ), etc.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition, FAT‐MXene MSC keeps about 97.8% of capacitance retention after 2000 cycles of charge and discharge (Figure S14, Supporting Information). Figure i shows the Ragone plots to compare the volumetric energy and power density of FAT‐MXene MSC with those of other graphene‐or MXene‐related MSCs and commercially available energy storage devices . The details of these MSCs are listed in Table S1, Supporting Information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, H 2 O molecules existed in Ti 3 C 2 T x films as bound water (mainly intercalated monolayer type water) could influence the conductivity and mechanical properties from the previous reports, henceforth the control of this type of H 2 O (typically by vacuum annealing at 150 °C) is not the main point in this work. What we expected to explore is the impact of confined water in Ti 3 C 2 T x films on mechanical properties, and the water content was controlled by stabilizing the film samples at 60 °C/10% RH and 20 °C/75% RH for 48 h. Interestingly, in 75% RH environment, stress–strain curves of pristine Ti 3 C 2 T x films were characterized by a hardening region at larger strain, which therefore rendered the record‐high strain energy of 1.48 ± 0.19 MJ m −3 and ultimate strength up to 114 MPa (of 0.1 m H + induced films) in pure Ti 3 C 2 T x films (Figure d; Table S1, Supporting Information) . The larger failure strain and lower modulus of films in 75% RH environment are the results of plasticity effect of H 2 O whereas the higher strength at large strain featured in pristine Ti 3 C 2 T x films implies the enhanced layer interactions (Figure S13, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Materials Performance and Applications Of Original/pristine mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…producing resultant nanocomposites with tensile strengths as high as 416 MPa while maintaining high electrical conductivities of up to of 690 S/cm. [ 20 ]…”
Section: Bioinspiration and Mineralization Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two typical material‐processing strategies: “top‐down” and “bottom‐up”. Both approaches have been widely applied for constructing polysaccharide‐based materials including hydrogels, [ 15,16 ] aerogels/carbon aerogels, [ 17,18 ] microspheres, [ 19 ] nanocomposites, [ 20 ] sponges, [ 21 ] bioplastics, [ 22 ] and membranes. [ 23 ] Crystalline polysaccharide‐based materials have been successfully utilized in various applications like textiles, [ 24 ] building blocks, [ 25,26 ] sensors, [ 27 ] water treatment, [ 28 ] heat‐insulators, [ 29 ] ionic conductors, [ 30 ] battery separators, [ 31 ] energy storage materials, [ 32 ] solar steam generators, [ 33 ] and biomedical devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%