The September 21 st announcement that the STEP study (of the recombinant Adenovirus serotype 5, rAd5 HIV-1 vaccine) was being halted for futility [1] was a serious setback in the quest for a vaccine to prevent or attenuate HIV-1 infection. The rAd5 vaccine (with or without DNA vaccine priming) had been the only strategy demonstrating apparently consistent immunogenicity for HIV-1-specific CD8 + T lymphocyte (CTL) responses in humans. This vaccine approach was held as the major hope for a strategy that would show some efficacy in human trials, to serve as a proof-of-concept working prototype vaccine to be refined and improved. This hope was dashed when interim analysis revealed 21/762 versus 24/741 infections in the placebo and vaccine groups respectively, with set-point viremia levels also being similar (37,000 versus 40,000 genomes/ml plasma respectively). Does this result indicate that a CTL-based vaccine is not the right approach? To date, the CTL response has been the only arm of adaptive immunity that has been clearly linked to control (albeit partial) of HIV-1 replication in vivo, as demonstrated by CTL being the major selective force for viral sequence evolution [2][3][4], and suggested by an inverse correlation of bulk CTL levels with viremia during CD8 depletion in the SIV-macaque model [5][6][7]. Such observations have been the basis for pursuing the CTL-based approach. The STEP study was pursued based on the apparent ability of the rAd5 vaccine to elicit HIV-1-specific CTL responses. Does the negative finding in this study indicate that a CTL-based approach is not a viable solution for a vaccine? Alternatively, is this a failure of the current vaccine to elicit functional CTL?
Requirements for CTL antiviral functionUnfortunately, a clear "correlate of immunity" based on any existing CTL measurements is lacking. To date, the interferon-γ ELISpot is the only validated assay for HIV-1 vaccine trials [8,9], by nature of its ease, reproducibility, and quantitative precision in mapping the targeting and magnitude of CTL responses. This assay provided the data that served as the basis for advancement of rAd5 into phase II human trials. However, ELISpot does not provide measurements that clearly correlate to immune control within infected persons, likely because it does not reflect antiviral function [10,11]. Measurements of CTL "polyfunctionality" via