2020
DOI: 10.1002/pen.25332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multifunctional Characteristics of Glass Fiber‐Reinforced Epoxy Polymer Composites with Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube Buckypaper Interlayer

Abstract: In this work, multiwalled carbon nanotube buckypaper (MWCNT‐BP) was inserted at the middle‐plane of glass fiber/epoxy resin prepregs to obtain three‐phase nanostructured composite. Preliminary tests conducted by differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric analyses (TGA) revealed that the proposed curing cycle to prepare the laminates in a hot compression‐molding machine was appropriated. The mechanical properties of the BP‐based composite studied by short beam shear and compression shear tests pres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PEI and PAEK-base composites with BP presented a reduction in thermal stability, a fact that may be associated with the low permeability of the CNT film. As previously discussed in the literature [74], the through-thickness permeability of the BP is around 10 − 17 to 10 − 19 m 2 , which is 4-6 orders of magnitude lower than conventional fiber reinforcements. The small pore size of the CNT film (100-200 nm) was not large enough to allow the polymers to efficiently flow to inside the CNT structure, weakening the interfacial adhesion of the composite, which revealed a worst thermal degradation performance of the laminates compared to BP/PEI samples.…”
Section: Thermal Behavior Of Nanostructured Compositesmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PEI and PAEK-base composites with BP presented a reduction in thermal stability, a fact that may be associated with the low permeability of the CNT film. As previously discussed in the literature [74], the through-thickness permeability of the BP is around 10 − 17 to 10 − 19 m 2 , which is 4-6 orders of magnitude lower than conventional fiber reinforcements. The small pore size of the CNT film (100-200 nm) was not large enough to allow the polymers to efficiently flow to inside the CNT structure, weakening the interfacial adhesion of the composite, which revealed a worst thermal degradation performance of the laminates compared to BP/PEI samples.…”
Section: Thermal Behavior Of Nanostructured Compositesmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…It is worth mentioning that the PEI semipreg presented a T i of 470 • C. These values demonstrate the excellent thermal stability of the material. According to the literature [72][73][74], the PEI decomposition occurs mainly due to the imide group's division and the methyl groups of the isopropylidene unit on the part of the bisphenol A, which contains the most unstable hydrogen atoms (H). The degradation of the material results in the formation of a wide variety of products, such as aromatic and aliphatic ketones, anhydrides, and hydroxyls.…”
Section: Thermal Behavior Of Nanostructured Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in this work, the storage modulus remained almost constant for all samples compared to the base laminate. As detailed in our previous work, 70 F I G U R E 6 Cross section views of (a-b) GF/EP; (c) GF/EP/BP/PF-1; (d) GF/EP/BP/PF-3; (e) GF/EP/BP/ RPF-1, and (f) GF/EP/BP/RPF-3 laminates [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] the low intrinsic permeability of CNT film, the incorporation of PF, and the high viscosity of the thermoset resin 66,67 can have made difficult the enhancement of the storage modulus of both BP/PF and BP/RPF composites, thus revealing no significant modifications in the E'of the BP composites. The T g of the laminates is obtained from the tan δ peak (Figure 7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Multi-walled CNTs (MWCNTs) have been extensively used as reinforcements due to their relatively low cost and easy availability. [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] However, a minimal study has been done on singlewalled CNTs (SWCNTs), [43][44][45][46][47][48][49] whereas there is almost no work to date on SWCNT reinforced flexible ethylene methyl acrylate (EMA) polymer matrix nanocomposites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%