1999
DOI: 10.1038/20924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multifractality in human heartbeat dynamics

Abstract: There is evidence that physiological signals under healthy conditions may have a fractal temporal structure. Here we investigate the possibility that time series generated by certain physiological control systems may be members of a special class of complex processes, termed multifractal, which require a large number of exponents to characterize their scaling properties. We report on evidence for multifractality in a biological dynamical system, the healthy human heartbeat, and show that the multifractal chara… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

43
849
4
14

Year Published

2004
2004
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,422 publications
(910 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
43
849
4
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results show that the activity data contains important phase correlations which are canceled in the surrogate signal by the randomization of the Fourier phases, and that these correlations do not exist in the simulated scheduled activity. Further, our tests indicate that these nonlinear features are encoded in Fourier phase, suggesting an intrinsic nonlinear mechanism [27]. The similar value of α mag for all three protocols and all individuals, which is different from α mag = 0.5 obtained for the simulated scheduled activity and for the phase randomized data, confirms that the intrinsic dynamics possess nonlinear features that are independent of the daily and weekly schedules, reaction to the environment, the average level of activity, and the phase of the circadian pacemaker.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results show that the activity data contains important phase correlations which are canceled in the surrogate signal by the randomization of the Fourier phases, and that these correlations do not exist in the simulated scheduled activity. Further, our tests indicate that these nonlinear features are encoded in Fourier phase, suggesting an intrinsic nonlinear mechanism [27]. The similar value of α mag for all three protocols and all individuals, which is different from α mag = 0.5 obtained for the simulated scheduled activity and for the phase randomized data, confirms that the intrinsic dynamics possess nonlinear features that are independent of the daily and weekly schedules, reaction to the environment, the average level of activity, and the phase of the circadian pacemaker.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Since α mag ≈ 0.8( > 0.5), there are positive long-range correlations in the magnitude series of activity increments, indicating the existence of nonlinear properties related to Fourier phase interactions (Fig. 5b) [26,27]. To confirm that the observed positive correlations in the magnitude series indeed represent nonlinear features in the activity data, we do the following test: we generate a surrogate time series by performing a Fourier transform on the activity recording from the same subject during daily routine as in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have used the range of Hölder exponent [21][22] or h(q min ) -h(q max ) [23] to quantify the multifractality degree of time series. However, estimates of the range of Hölder exponent often encounter a problem of numerical instability [24].…”
Section: P V (M )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, first applications of nonlinear dynamics tools in medical diagnostics have been met with success over the last decade [Focus Issue: Dynamical Disease: Mathematical Analysis of Human Illness, 1995; Kantz et al, 1998]. So far, however, research was limited either to only analyze data [Goldberger et al, 1988;Yamamoto & Hughson, 1994a;Cerutti et al, 1996;Poon & Merrill, 1997;Ivanov et al, 1999;Schmidt et al, 1999a;Yang et al, 2003;Wessel et al, 2004c], or develop models [Garfinkel et al, 1992;Wikswo et al, 1995;Gray et al, 1998;Witkowski et al, 1998;Ditto & Showalter, 1998 Heart, 2003]. A further aim of this tutorial, therefore, is, to go a qualitatively new step: the combination of data analysis and modeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%