2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multifractal dimensions of soil particle size distribution reveal the erodibility and fertility of alpine grassland soils in the Northern Tibet Plateau

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many reports collectively validate this result. For example, Wang et al (2022b) reported that there was a significant positive correlation between the width range of the soil particle distribution and the clay and silt in alpine desert grasslands, and that plant coverage positively affected the width and inhomogeneity of the soil particle distribution [60]. Sun et al (2016) reported that the multifractal parameters of topsoil in the Loess Plateau were driven by the SOC and TN [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many reports collectively validate this result. For example, Wang et al (2022b) reported that there was a significant positive correlation between the width range of the soil particle distribution and the clay and silt in alpine desert grasslands, and that plant coverage positively affected the width and inhomogeneity of the soil particle distribution [60]. Sun et al (2016) reported that the multifractal parameters of topsoil in the Loess Plateau were driven by the SOC and TN [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Land restoration measures greatly influence the extent and direction of soil structure quality changes 26 , 27 . Soil contains irregular particles and voids 28 and has a complex structure. Traditional soil texture analysis methods describe soil particle distribution (PSD) based on the percentage of different particle contents in the total weight of the soil, which usually results in incomplete soil PSD information 29 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, soil erodibility factors would be best calculated from direct field measurements with the help of natural runoff diagrams but getting these types of records for long-term studies are too expensive and time-consuming (Dangler and El-Swaify, 1976;Efthimiou, 2020;Torri et al, 1997;Young and Mutchler, 1977). So, various attempts had been made to correlate soil properties with the measured soil erodibility factors (Cohen et al, 2005;Wang et al, 2022). The widely adopted relationship to estimate K-factor is the soil erodibility nomograph approach (Wischmeier and Smith, 1978) which uses more easily obtainable datasets such as soil texture, structure, permeability and SOM (soil organic matter) (Efthimiou, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%