2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2003.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multifractal description of fracture morphology: investigation of the fractures of sintered carbides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jan Cwajna is exploring the topic of theoretical stereology, non-homogeneity quantification, and quantitative fractography (Cwajna, 1994, Cwajna, 2005, Cwajna et al, 1997, Stach et al, 2005a. Image analysis algorithms are the specialty of Janusz Szala, who developed software called Met-Ilo for image processing and analysis (Szala, 2003a;.…”
Section: Scientific Stereological Groups In Polandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jan Cwajna is exploring the topic of theoretical stereology, non-homogeneity quantification, and quantitative fractography (Cwajna, 1994, Cwajna, 2005, Cwajna et al, 1997, Stach et al, 2005a. Image analysis algorithms are the specialty of Janusz Szala, who developed software called Met-Ilo for image processing and analysis (Szala, 2003a;.…”
Section: Scientific Stereological Groups In Polandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems that such experimentally determined dependences with a significant linear theoretical fit imply a fractal (or self-similar) character of measured surfaces. Also, several authors note the multifractality of the surface [24,25]. It is contentious whether the dependences presented in [24] express "multifractality" or non-fractality of surface.…”
Section: Determination Of the Specific Surface Area (Ssa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the rapid development of 3D methods [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] and an increase in the number of experimentally determinable roughness parameters, a standard regulating their number and systematizing them [37] has been developed. In this standard, 3D parameters are denoted with the capital letters S and V in order to distinguish them from 2D parameters (usually denoted with the letter R).…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%