2008
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2008.0547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multifocal White Matter Ultrastructural Abnormalities in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury with Cognitive Disability: A Voxel-Wise Analysis of Diffusion Tensor Imaging

Abstract: The purpose of the present study is to identify otherwise occult white matter abnormalities in patients suffering persistent cognitive impairment due to mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). The study had Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, included informed consent and complied with the U.S. Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996. We retrospectively analyzed diffusion tensor MRI (DTI) of 17 patients (nine women, eight men; age range 26-70 years) who had cognitive impairment du… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
163
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
8
163
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, DTI findings in acute mTBI differ from what is typically seen in more chronic TBI, wherein DTI-defined WM abnormalities reflect degenerative changes. 20 Lipton et al 4 have shown that in adults with mTBI and lasting cognitive sequelae, nonspecific WM changes were observed that were similar to those in reports of nonspecific sub-cortical WM changes in more severe TBI but to a lesser degree. Nonetheless, the detected chronic WM lesions associated with mTBI were widespread.…”
Section: ϫ3supporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, DTI findings in acute mTBI differ from what is typically seen in more chronic TBI, wherein DTI-defined WM abnormalities reflect degenerative changes. 20 Lipton et al 4 have shown that in adults with mTBI and lasting cognitive sequelae, nonspecific WM changes were observed that were similar to those in reports of nonspecific sub-cortical WM changes in more severe TBI but to a lesser degree. Nonetheless, the detected chronic WM lesions associated with mTBI were widespread.…”
Section: ϫ3supporting
confidence: 63%
“…Findings suggest that the effects of mTBI are indeed widespread, consistent with the distribution of DTI abnormalities observed during the chronic phase following mTBI. [4][5][6]34 Given that the participants were all scanned within 6 days of injury, it is plausible that some of these acute abnormalities may evolve into more chronic WM changes. Longitudinal DTI investigation of patients with mTBI is underway to evaluate this further.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…24 WM abnormalities have also been shown 25 in patients with mTBI exhibiting persistent cognitive impairment (8 months to 3 years postinjury). The latter investigators demonstrated decreased FA and increased MD in the corpus callosum (CC), bilateral capsula interna (CI), and other subcortical WM structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Studies of TBI using DTI, as well as the software to analyze these data, have been steadily increasing in recent years. Significant differences in the FA, ADC, or MD, or other DTIderived diffusivity metrics have been demonstrated in studies of TBI in both adults (Bigler et al, 2010b;Kraus et al, 2007;Lipton et al, 2008;Perlbarg et al, 2009;Warner et al, 2010a) and children (Ewing-Cobbs et al, 2008;Levin et al, 2008;McCauley et al, 2011;Wilde et al, 2006bWilde et al, , 2010Wozniak et al, 2007;Wu et al, 2010a;Yuan et al, 2007), with decreases in FA and increases in measures of diffusivity often found in chronic post-injury intervals. More importantly, changes in DTIderived measures have shown correlation with injury severity (Arfanakis et al, 2002;Benson et al, 2007;Wilde et al, 2010;Yuan et al, 2007), functional outcome (Huisman et al, 2004;Levin et al, 2008;Salmond et al, 2006;Wozniak et al, 2007), neurologic functioning (Caeyenberghs et al, 2010a,b), and cognitive ability (Bigler et al, 2010b;Ewing-Cobbs et al, 2008;Kraus et al, 2007;Kumar et al, 2009;Levin et al, 2008;McCauley et al, 2011;Niogi et al, 2008;Salmond et al, 2006;Warner et al, 2010a;Wilde et al, 2010).…”
Section: Fig 1 Ct (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%