2002
DOI: 10.1002/mpo.10107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multifocal hepatoblastoma: Is there a place for partial hepatectomy?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recommendations for primary transplant in all patients with POST-TEXT IV or centrally located POST-TEXT III disease are based on indirect and hypothetical evidence only. 13,15,18,21 Proponents of this approach cite 1) the universally poor outcomes that have been reported in patients requiring rescue transplant for disease recurrence after resection, 2) the risk of macroscopic residual disease after radical nonanatomic resections, 3) the potential hazards of microscopic residual disease when centrally located tumors are dissected off main hilar structures, and 4) the possibility of viable tumor cells in sections of the liver that appear to have been cleared of disease by preoperative chemotherapy. [13][14][15]18,21 Although the outcomes of rescue transplant for recurrent disease after resection have been poor, with most series reporting 20% to 30% survival, 12,13 it is unknown how often and in what patients this scenario occurs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recommendations for primary transplant in all patients with POST-TEXT IV or centrally located POST-TEXT III disease are based on indirect and hypothetical evidence only. 13,15,18,21 Proponents of this approach cite 1) the universally poor outcomes that have been reported in patients requiring rescue transplant for disease recurrence after resection, 2) the risk of macroscopic residual disease after radical nonanatomic resections, 3) the potential hazards of microscopic residual disease when centrally located tumors are dissected off main hilar structures, and 4) the possibility of viable tumor cells in sections of the liver that appear to have been cleared of disease by preoperative chemotherapy. [13][14][15]18,21 Although the outcomes of rescue transplant for recurrent disease after resection have been poor, with most series reporting 20% to 30% survival, 12,13 it is unknown how often and in what patients this scenario occurs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This principle is guided by the high risk of recurrence from small non-detected viable HB cell remnant after chemotherapy. The sites of all currently and previously visible HB lesions should be excised [104].…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cases presented here suggest that standard HB (standard age at diagnosis, standard histology, secretion of AFP) with a good response to chemotherapy might represent such a tumor-response profile. However, these factors seem currently insufficient to predict the complete microscopic sterilization of the tumor cells in the hepatic remnant after partial hepatectomy: Dall'Igna et al [32] reported a very similar case of a 6-year-old child, with AFP-secreting PRETEXT IV multinodular HB, without extrahepatic disease, with embryonal and fetal histology, and very good response to chemotherapy. Nodules in the left lobe had completely disappeared on preoperative imaging and were no longer identifiable during laparotomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Immunosuppression has been successfully adapted, with low doses and steroid-free regimens, to reduce cumulated chemotherapy- related toxicity [15]. (4) Macroscopically cleared tumor nodules before surgery sometimes display viable tumor cells [32]. Therefore, since 2004 [4], primary total hepatectomy with LT has become the standard surgical treatment of multinodular panhepatic HBs, without extrahepatic disease after chemotherapy, whatever the regression of intrahepatic lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%