1993
DOI: 10.1016/0090-3019(93)90127-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multifocal giant cell glioblastoma: Case report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11,14 These tumors are usually located supratentorially, mostly in the temporal lobe, and only rarely have they been reported infratentorially or within the spinal cord. 5,12 These tumors have been diagnosed primarily in younger adults with a peak incidence in the age group under 20 years of age 2 and in pediatric patients. A giant cell glioblastoma arising from the caudal brainstem has not been reported previously in adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,14 These tumors are usually located supratentorially, mostly in the temporal lobe, and only rarely have they been reported infratentorially or within the spinal cord. 5,12 These tumors have been diagnosed primarily in younger adults with a peak incidence in the age group under 20 years of age 2 and in pediatric patients. A giant cell glioblastoma arising from the caudal brainstem has not been reported previously in adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multifocal gliomas may either exhibit the same [15,16] or different histologies among the multiple intracranial tumors [17]. In a case report of a patient with an oligodendroglioma and a juvenile pilocytic astrocytoma, a deletion of chromosome 1p36 in the oligodendroglioma was reported, but not in the juvenile pilocytic astrocytoma.…”
Section: Pathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CT and MRI findings of a case of giant cell glioblastoma were also described by Zipp, et al. [5] , and Parekh et al., in a 1993 paper, also published the CT findings of a case of multifocal GC [6] . Older cases including a radiologic description have also been published by Asklen, et al., who noted the radiologic appearance of the tumor to be well demarcated but otherwise without distinguishing features [ 7 , 8 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%