2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multifidelity multilevel Monte Carlo to accelerate approximate Bayesian parameter inference for partially observed stochastic processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, hybrid multiscale models require estimating parameters that modulate several relevant processes, such as cell-cell communication, gene regulation, cell division, cell death, oxygen consumption, and interactions, resulting in highly complex models. Furthermore, it is challenging to calibrate and validate these models due to the limited availability of patient-specific data (particularly spatially resolved, serial data) and the substantial computational cost of their iterative parameter fitting techniques [25][26][27]. Consequently, it will be essential to integrate machine learning and high-performance computing (HPC) techniques when creating virtual patient models [25,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, hybrid multiscale models require estimating parameters that modulate several relevant processes, such as cell-cell communication, gene regulation, cell division, cell death, oxygen consumption, and interactions, resulting in highly complex models. Furthermore, it is challenging to calibrate and validate these models due to the limited availability of patient-specific data (particularly spatially resolved, serial data) and the substantial computational cost of their iterative parameter fitting techniques [25][26][27]. Consequently, it will be essential to integrate machine learning and high-performance computing (HPC) techniques when creating virtual patient models [25,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, choosing the best error function for comparing experimental data with model output is challenging. Methods of calibrating computational biology models include nonlinear least squares regression 9 , maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), maximum a prior (MAP) estimation 10 , Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) 11 , and genetic algorithms 12 , among others [13][14][15][16] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%