1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81851-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multifetal reduction increases the risk of preterm delivery and fetal growth restriction in twins: A case-control study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fetal growth restriction is more frequently observed in twins after reduction than among natural twins (6,16). It could be explained by the persistence of fetal tissue in the uterine cavity, which could limit the intrauterine surface available for placenta development and decrease the nutritional exchange (16). This residual tissue also could induce a subclinical inflammatory response that could play a role in spontaneous preterm labor (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fetal growth restriction is more frequently observed in twins after reduction than among natural twins (6,16). It could be explained by the persistence of fetal tissue in the uterine cavity, which could limit the intrauterine surface available for placenta development and decrease the nutritional exchange (16). This residual tissue also could induce a subclinical inflammatory response that could play a role in spontaneous preterm labor (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could be explained by the persistence of fetal tissue in the uterine cavity, which could limit the intrauterine surface available for placenta development and decrease the nutritional exchange (16). This residual tissue also could induce a subclinical inflammatory response that could play a role in spontaneous preterm labor (16). Although fetal reduction is an effective measure to decrease morbidity and mortality of high-order multiple pregnancies, it does not eliminate all the risks, such as prematurity and low birth weight (6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under transabdominal ultrasonography control, a suction catheter is led through the cervix channel, and the gestational sack in the lowest location is aspired. This method is, however, being abandoned due to frequent occurrence of uncontrollable bleeding resulting in termination of pregnancy, and high risk of infection (Berkowitz et al, 1988;Dechaud et al, 1998 A number of studies may be found in the literature which document negative effects of reduction on perinatal results of twin pregnancies (Alexander et al, 1995;Melgar et al, 1991;Silver et al, 1997). For example, Melgar et al (1991) demonstrated this on a group of 14 twin pregnancies originated as a result of reduction of triple and quadruple pregnancies, by comparing them with 22 twin pregnancies where reduction was not performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This information may be useful for prognostic counseling in cases of spontaneous IUFD in twins, and may be a better comparison group for cases of late 1st trimester and early 2nd trimester selective termination [11], multifetal pregnancy reduction in the late 1st trimester and early 2nd trimester [12][13][14], or delayed interval delivery. In addition, identification of cotwin survivors may allow longitudinal study of the long-term development outcomes in cotwin survivors compared to matched controls [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%