1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70276-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multifetal pregnancy reduction is not associated with an increased risk of intrauterine growth restriction, except for very-high-order multiples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
21
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are consistent with a number of other studies (Evans et al, 1988;Evans et al, 1996;Fasouliotis & Schenker, 1997;Selam et al, 1999;Torok et al, 1998;Yaron et al, 1999). For example, a study by Torok et al (1998) compares 441 monitored pregnancies after reduction with 136 pregnancies where reduction was not performed, and it proves that reduction of multi-fetal pregnancy is not related to intra-uterine growth retardation of fetus, nor to shorter length of pregnancy, unless the original number of fetuses is 5 or more. Another study supporting our conclusion is a study by Yaron et al (1999), where they prove that reduction of a triple pregnancy to a twin one reduces the risk of prematurity, while perinatal results do not differ from results of originally twin pregnancies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our results are consistent with a number of other studies (Evans et al, 1988;Evans et al, 1996;Fasouliotis & Schenker, 1997;Selam et al, 1999;Torok et al, 1998;Yaron et al, 1999). For example, a study by Torok et al (1998) compares 441 monitored pregnancies after reduction with 136 pregnancies where reduction was not performed, and it proves that reduction of multi-fetal pregnancy is not related to intra-uterine growth retardation of fetus, nor to shorter length of pregnancy, unless the original number of fetuses is 5 or more. Another study supporting our conclusion is a study by Yaron et al (1999), where they prove that reduction of a triple pregnancy to a twin one reduces the risk of prematurity, while perinatal results do not differ from results of originally twin pregnancies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The success rates of fetal reduction have improved with increasing experience, a smaller number of fetuses comprising HOMP, and superior equipment. Although the technique of multifetal pregnancy reduction is a very safe procedure (4,5,9), in the current study, the reduced twin group was associated with elevated rates of prematurity. This means that some effects of HOMP exert persistently and are unable to be totally eliminated by selective fetal reduction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…We therefore questioned whether premature delivery was related to the initial number of embryos implanted in the uterus. In a retrospective study, Torok et al (9) investigated the gestational age distribution of twins at the time of birth as a function of the initial number of fetuses. They found that the prematurity rate associated with two, three, four, and five or more fetuses was 61%, 64.8%, 66.9%, and 67.4%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the excess perinatal morbidity and mortality is directly related to preterm birth. The problem of multiple pregnancy is not easily resolved by multifetal reduction, because reduction decreases, but does not eliminate, the risk of fetal growth restriction or loss of the entire pregnancy [5,6].…”
Section: Risks Of Multiple Pregnanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%