2018
DOI: 10.3390/s18113828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multifeature Extraction and Seafloor Classification Combining LiDAR and MBES Data around Yuanzhi Island in the South China Sea

Abstract: Airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) full waveforms and multibeam echo sounding (MBES) backscatter data contain rich information about seafloor features and are important data sources representing seafloor topography and geomorphology. Currently, to classify seafloor types using MBES, curve features are extracted from backscatter angle responses or grayscale, and texture features are extracted from backscatter images based on gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM). To classify seafloor types using LiDA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The random selection of the input weights and deviations causes the ELM model to generate overfitting and instability problems [41], requiring a swarm intelligence algorithm to optimize its parameters. Common swarm intelligence algorithms include the ant colony algorithm [42], GA [27], and PSO [28]. In this paper, the PSO and RELM model are combined into the MELM classifier to optimize the weights and biases of the input layer (Figure 5).…”
Section: Relm Model and Pso Combined Into Melm Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The random selection of the input weights and deviations causes the ELM model to generate overfitting and instability problems [41], requiring a swarm intelligence algorithm to optimize its parameters. Common swarm intelligence algorithms include the ant colony algorithm [42], GA [27], and PSO [28]. In this paper, the PSO and RELM model are combined into the MELM classifier to optimize the weights and biases of the input layer (Figure 5).…”
Section: Relm Model and Pso Combined Into Melm Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, swarm intelligence algorithms could be used to optimize parameters of classifiers. For example, a NN with a genetic algorithm (GA) [27] and an SVM with particle swarm optimization (PSO) [28] were used to classify the sediments in offshore areas and islands, achieving better classification results. However, the classification sensitivity of these techniques needs to be improved in order to distinguish more types of sediments and the small differences in category characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predictive value of these variables is better than that of MBES data (i.e., bathymetric map and backscatter mosaic) as they provide the detailed information on seabed topography and substrata [51,52]. Among the various predictors, the majority of previous research typically used slope, curvature, eastness, and northness derived from bathymetric map and Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) texture features [53][54][55][56][57] and Angular Range Analysis (ARA) parameters derived from backscatter mosaic [58][59][60]. Though bathymetric map has higher importance in modelling seagrass habitats [12,[61][62][63][64], other backscatter predictors may also contribute significantly to improve the model [62,65].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preston [8] used simulated annealing (SA) algorithms for sediment classification based on multi-beam data. Wang et al [9] compared the performances of different support vector machine (SVM) models on sediment classification tasks based on multi-beam and LiDAR data. Stewart et al [10] combined side-scan sonar imagery with Back Propagation neural networks (BPNNs) to classify sediments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%