Multifactor Biometric Authentication for Cloud Computing Security

More, Dhanshree; Deore, Bhushan; Bhosale, Surendra

doi:10.1007/978-981-19-0976-4_32

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Secure mutual authentication validates the legitimacy of participating parties, and key agreement ensures the confidentiality of transmitted data in the open network of clouds. Authentication can be based on single‐factor, 9‐14 two‐factor, 15‐19 or multi‐factor 20‐25 . Single‐factor authentication establishes passwords between participating parties for legitimacy verification.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A novel and provably secure mutual authentication protocol for cloud environment using elliptic curve cryptography and fuzzy verifier

Patel

Shukla

Patel

2023

Concurrency and Computation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryCloud computing is an emerging paradigm that enables on‐demand data storage without considering the local infrastructure limitations of end‐users. The extensive growth in number of servers, resources, and networks intensifies security and privacy concerns in clouds. This necessitates secure mutual authentication and key agreement mechanism to verify the legitimacy of participating entities. In accordance, several authentication protocols have been designed to authenticate end‐users over insecure channels. This article presents security analysis of recent protocols that claim to render security and privacy features. We demonstrate that Kaur et al.'s protocol is vulnerable to replay attack, Dharminder et al.'s protocol is prone to user traceability and known session‐specific temporary information (KSSTI) attacks, and Bouchaala et al.'s protocol is prone to replay and KSSTI attacks. To withstand the aforementioned attacks, we propose an enhanced protocol based on fuzzy verifier and elliptic curve cryptography for clouds. Our protocol safeguards against security attacks while providing privacy functionalities. The security analysis is illustrated under real‐or‐random model, and correctness is verified under the Scyther security verification tool. Finally, comparative analysis with existing protocols shows that our protocol delivers robust security with reasonable computational and communication overheads than state‐of‐the‐art protocols.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Authentication can be based on single-factor, [9][10][11][12][13][14] two-factor, [15][16][17][18][19] or multi-factor. [20][21][22][23][24][25] Single-factor authentication establishes passwords between participating parties for legitimacy verification. However, passwords are typically short and prone to dictionary and password-guessing attacks.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%