Multidisciplinary decision‐making strategies may reduce the need for secondary surgery in complex colonic polyps – A systematic review and pooled analysis

Abstract

Aim:The recognition of complex colonic polyps is increasing. Management varies considerably and the impact of this on clinical outcomes is unclear. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the impact of group decision-making strategies and defined selection criteria on the treatment outcomes of complex colonic polyps.Method: A systematic literature review identified studies reporting complex polyp treatment outcomes and describing their decision-making strategies. Databases searched included PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL and Scopus. Articles were identified by two blinded reviewers using defined inclusion criteria. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO and performed in line with PRISMA guidelines.Results: There were 303 identified articles describing treatment outcomes of complex colonic polyps. Only nine of these fully described the decision-making strategy and met the inclusion criteria. Adverse events ranged from 1.3% to 10% across the studies. Unsuspected malignancy and secondary surgery rates ranged from 2.4% to 15.4% and 3.3% to 43.9%, respectively. Grouping of articles into a hierarchy of decision-making strategies demonstrated a sequential reduction in secondary surgery rates with improving strategies. There were no differences in comparisons of adverse event or unsuspected malignancy rates. Conclusions:There is limited description of decision-making strategies and variability in reporting of studies describing complex polyp treatment outcomes. The use of multidisciplinary decision-making and defined selection criteria may reduce the need for secondary surgical intervention in complex colonic polyps, but further evidence is required to draw definite conclusions.

Planning management for complex colorectal polyps: a qualitative assessment of factors influencing decision-making among colonoscopists

“…Colorectal polyps are precursors to colorectal cancer development. 1 Their morphological spectrum is considerable 2 and in larger or more complex lesions, the decision-making and technical challenges of treatment are significant.…”

The role of the multidisciplinary tumor board after endoscopic resection of malignant tumors: is it worth it?

“…However, the introduction of endoscopic resection as a curative treatment for low-risk early gastrointestinal malignancies has widened the therapeutic spectrum and revealed new challenges, including the correct indications for endoscopic resection and the evaluation of the necessity and planning of additional treatment after non-curative resections [ 4 , 7 – 9 ]. Despite the increasing importance of the interdisciplinary management of these early malignancies, there are very few reports on MTB implementation before or after their endoscopic resection, focusing mainly on colorectal lesions [ 10 , 11 ].…”