2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.05.101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multidisciplinary care improves amputation-free survival in patients with chronic critical limb ischemia

Abstract: MDC pathways for the management of a population of CLI patients improved AFS by greater than twofold and should be the standard of care for the CLI population. Baseline nonambulatory status and unrevascularized patients also predict worse AFS. Wound healing remains prolonged regardless of preoperative or postoperative wound care. Future study is required to evaluate the costs and functional outcomes for MDC in the management of CLI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
66
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nutritional factors were potentially a correctable parameter in the patients' risk. Chung et al 18 mentioned the positive effect of multidisciplinary care, including nutritional management, for CLI patients. The GNRI might be useful to evaluate the objective effect before and after therapeutic intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nutritional factors were potentially a correctable parameter in the patients' risk. Chung et al 18 mentioned the positive effect of multidisciplinary care, including nutritional management, for CLI patients. The GNRI might be useful to evaluate the objective effect before and after therapeutic intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Benoit et al have shown significant improvement of 1‐year amputation‐free survival (AFS) from ≈28–40% in trials performed during the period 1996–1999 to 48–81% during the period 2006–2010 for patients with nonrevascularizable CLI32 and a tendency for major amputation rates to decline from 20–50% to 10–38% during the same period. Improvements in prognosis over time in this no‐option CLI population suggest a role for factors other than increased frequency of endovascular interventions, such as increased public awareness, better medical therapy, improved wound care,33 and secondary prevention.…”
Section: Changing Prognosis In CLImentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A megfelelő konzervatív kezelés hiánya több mint négyszeres kockázatot jelentett az alsó végtagi major amputáció vonatkozásában [48]. További olyan tényezők, amelyek nem az alsó végtagi revascularisatióval közvetlenül függnek össze és a klinikai tanulmányok alapján az alsó végtagi amputációk megelő-zésében jótékonynak bizonyultak: hemoglobin-A-1c-csökkentés [49], statinterápia [50], optimális gyógysze-res kezelés [48], dohányzás felfüggesztése [51], rendszeres alsó végtagi ellenőrzés [52], dialízisminőség [53], a beteg, illetve az ellátószemélyzet edukációja [54,55], betegút-optimalizálás [56], multidiszciplináris kezelés [57], egészségtudatosság szintjének növelése [55].…”
Section: Az Egészségügyi Ellátórendszer Szerepe Az Alsó Végtagi Amputunclassified