“…In our previous study, using the integrative approach of multidimensional visualization (NovoSpark Corporation) to portray immune system (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35) 28 (28-28) 24 (20-28) 23 (18-30) 25 (19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32) CD4 + /CD8 + ratio 1.2 (0.9-1.7) 1.2 (0.9-1.7) 1.3 (0.8-1.7) 1.4 (0.7-1.7) 1.2 (0.8-1.9) 0.8 (0.7-0.9) 1.6 (1.0-2.3) 1.2 (0.9-1.8) 1.2 (0.9-1.7) CD56 + NK cells, % 15 (9- Note: *differences are statistically significant in comparison with group without progression, p < 0.05; # differences are statistically significant in comparison with group favorable immune system state, p < 0.05. state as a single visual image [43], we found that the immune system can be reside in at least two differ ent states. One status, which we called as favorable, was observed in BC patients without recurrence, and another status -unfavorable -was associated with relapses in BC patients within 3 year followup pe riod [43]. Existence of different states of an immune system in cancer patients is in concordance with the concept of cancer immunoediting, which postulated immune system ability to protect cancer or, in contrast, to promote tumor growth and progression [47].…”