2015
DOI: 10.1063/1.4936066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multidimensional visualization for the immune system state presentation in breast cancer patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our previous study, using the integrative approach of multidimensional visualization (NovoSpark Corporation) to portray immune system (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35) 28 (28-28) 24 (20-28) 23 (18-30) 25 (19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32) CD4 + /CD8 + ratio 1.2 (0.9-1.7) 1.2 (0.9-1.7) 1.3 (0.8-1.7) 1.4 (0.7-1.7) 1.2 (0.8-1.9) 0.8 (0.7-0.9) 1.6 (1.0-2.3) 1.2 (0.9-1.8) 1.2 (0.9-1.7) CD56 + NK cells, % 15 (9- Note: *differences are statistically significant in comparison with group without progression, p < 0.05; # differences are statistically significant in comparison with group favorable immune system state, p < 0.05. state as a single visual image [43], we found that the immune system can be reside in at least two differ ent states. One status, which we called as favorable, was observed in BC patients without recurrence, and another status -unfavorable -was associated with relapses in BC patients within 3 year followup pe riod [43]. Existence of different states of an immune system in cancer patients is in concordance with the concept of cancer immunoediting, which postulated immune system ability to protect cancer or, in contrast, to promote tumor growth and progression [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our previous study, using the integrative approach of multidimensional visualization (NovoSpark Corporation) to portray immune system (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35) 28 (28-28) 24 (20-28) 23 (18-30) 25 (19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32) CD4 + /CD8 + ratio 1.2 (0.9-1.7) 1.2 (0.9-1.7) 1.3 (0.8-1.7) 1.4 (0.7-1.7) 1.2 (0.8-1.9) 0.8 (0.7-0.9) 1.6 (1.0-2.3) 1.2 (0.9-1.8) 1.2 (0.9-1.7) CD56 + NK cells, % 15 (9- Note: *differences are statistically significant in comparison with group without progression, p < 0.05; # differences are statistically significant in comparison with group favorable immune system state, p < 0.05. state as a single visual image [43], we found that the immune system can be reside in at least two differ ent states. One status, which we called as favorable, was observed in BC patients without recurrence, and another status -unfavorable -was associated with relapses in BC patients within 3 year followup pe riod [43]. Existence of different states of an immune system in cancer patients is in concordance with the concept of cancer immunoediting, which postulated immune system ability to protect cancer or, in contrast, to promote tumor growth and progression [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In our previous study, we have applied the approach of NovoSpark multidimensional data visualization to generate an integral characteristic of the immune system state, uniting 52 separate immunological pa rameters, in 65 BC patients before treatment [43]. When we analyzed features of a visual curve as an integral characteristic of the immune system for each BC pa tient, we found that its location in multidimensional data space depends on disease outcome followed for 3 years [43]. The obtained data allow us to assume that a unified characteristic of the integral state of the im mune system can have a predictive value for cancer out come.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visualization of the state of the immune system in metastatic melanoma patients with different responses to vaccine therapy Visualization of the immune system state as a multidimensional observation makes it possible to demonstrate a qualitative difference in the immunological status in cancer patients [7,[12][13][14]. It is important that this methodological approach allows identification of immunological parameters that are statistically significant for discrimination of the immune system state in groups with various clinical manifestations.…”
Section: State Of the Immune System In Melanoma Patients With Differe...mentioning
confidence: 99%