2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10559-019-00108-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multidimensional Scaling by Means of Pseudoinverse Operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the validity of our approach for the stance-detection task, we carried out computational experiments using the FNC-1 dataset and compared our findings with the leading approaches in identifying the stance of texts. This comparison included: (i) the original FNC-1 challenge baseline [42] that used feature engineering, (ii)-(iv) the top three systems from the FNC-1 challenge [43][44][45] as determined by their confusion matrices, (v) a recent study by Zhang et al [46] that had notable success with the FNC-1 dataset, (vi) current state-of-the-art by Sepulveda-Torres et al [40] in this task using the FNC-1 dataset, and (vii) our proposed approach that works by pulling out weights from the penultimate layer of the RoBERTa model and putting together the transition matrix T. The key metrics for comparison include the F 1 -score (21) for four stance categories ("Agree", "Disagree", "Discuss", and "Unrelated") and two overall performance indicators: the macro-average F 1 m (22) and weighted accuracy (23). The results shown in Table 5 are from applying all these approaches to the FNC-1 dataset.…”
Section: Interpreting Stance Detection Based On the Fnc-1 Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To evaluate the validity of our approach for the stance-detection task, we carried out computational experiments using the FNC-1 dataset and compared our findings with the leading approaches in identifying the stance of texts. This comparison included: (i) the original FNC-1 challenge baseline [42] that used feature engineering, (ii)-(iv) the top three systems from the FNC-1 challenge [43][44][45] as determined by their confusion matrices, (v) a recent study by Zhang et al [46] that had notable success with the FNC-1 dataset, (vi) current state-of-the-art by Sepulveda-Torres et al [40] in this task using the FNC-1 dataset, and (vii) our proposed approach that works by pulling out weights from the penultimate layer of the RoBERTa model and putting together the transition matrix T. The key metrics for comparison include the F 1 -score (21) for four stance categories ("Agree", "Disagree", "Discuss", and "Unrelated") and two overall performance indicators: the macro-average F 1 m (22) and weighted accuracy (23). The results shown in Table 5 are from applying all these approaches to the FNC-1 dataset.…”
Section: Interpreting Stance Detection Based On the Fnc-1 Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visualization aids in uncovering patterns, trends, and correlations that might otherwise go unnoticed. Notably, multidimensional scaling (MDS) [23] is considered an effective VA tool, allowing for the visualization of multidimensional data based on their similarity, presenting information about the distances between objects as points in an abstract space. Furthermore, the concept of HITL is used to denote human participation in the process of aiding the computer to make accurate decisions during model development [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various algorithms based on conventional computer vision with hand-crafted features, such as the histogram of oriented gradients [7], bag-of-features [8], hyperplanes separation [9]. Unfortunately, due to mentioned before, peculiarities of the hand and it's high-dynamic nature, such approaches are not robust enough and suffer a lot from changes in environment, background, or quality of the input images.…”
Section: Existing Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method of MDS allows to place objects in a space of some small dimension (in this case, it is equal to two) in order to reproduce the observed distances between them with the smallest error. Thus, representing the visibility of the location of objects in the generalized two‐dimensional space of generalized features 64,65 …”
Section: Separating N‐dimensional Objects By Hyperplanes For Classifi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, representing the visibility of the location of objects in the generalized two-dimensional space of generalized features. 64,65 Furthermore, data visualization is used as a way of displaying a multidimensional distribution of data on a two-dimensional plane, in which the basic patterns inherent in the original distribution are qualitatively displayed. At the same time, it is necessary to minimize the loss of information content and its manifestations in the cluster structure, topological features, and dependencies between the characteristics of the location of the data in the original space.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Problem Classification Bas...mentioning
confidence: 99%