The Wiley Handbook of Psychometric Testing 2018
DOI: 10.1002/9781118489772.ch16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multidimensional Item Response Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation between the two latent variables was not significantly different from zero for any of the six subgroups (r = −0.14-0.04); furthermore, estimating a two-factor model in which the correlation between the two factors is fixed to zero results in the improvement of most model fit statistics (RMSEA = 0.072, CFI = 0.96, TLI = 0.95, SRMR = 0.06). This finding suggests that the multidimensional scale really comprises two unidimensional scales (Liu et al, 2018). Thus, we proceeded to treat the measure as two unidimensional measures, entitled "Openness to Seeking Treatment" and "Value and Need in Seeking Treatment.…”
Section: Scale Dimensionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation between the two latent variables was not significantly different from zero for any of the six subgroups (r = −0.14-0.04); furthermore, estimating a two-factor model in which the correlation between the two factors is fixed to zero results in the improvement of most model fit statistics (RMSEA = 0.072, CFI = 0.96, TLI = 0.95, SRMR = 0.06). This finding suggests that the multidimensional scale really comprises two unidimensional scales (Liu et al, 2018). Thus, we proceeded to treat the measure as two unidimensional measures, entitled "Openness to Seeking Treatment" and "Value and Need in Seeking Treatment.…”
Section: Scale Dimensionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and explicating the relationship thereof. When the survey is composed of items, multidimensional item response theory (MIRT; e.g., Liu, Magnus, Quinn, & Thissen, ; Reckase, ), also known as item factor analysis (IFA; e.g., Wirth & Edwards, ), provides a unified framework and convenient statistical tools for item analysis and scoring. The increasing scale and complexity of survey designs call for MIRT models with many latent traits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the multi‐dimensional surveys of Section 4.1.2, 4.1.3, and Appendix A1.2, a greedy sequential approach is likely to work: apply the semi‐automated procedure to find an instrument, remove the corresponding items from the original dataset, and apply the same procedure once more to find the next instrument. A more involved integrated approach would adapt the GPCM to allow for multiple abilities per subject, corresponding to different dimensions, for example along the lines of Liu, Magnus, O'Connor, and Thissen (2018), Adams et al . (1997) and Kelderman (1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%