2017
DOI: 10.1111/jpc.13445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multidimensional impact on families of children with steroid‐sensitive nephrotic syndrome

Abstract: FI score should be evaluated in all cases of NS as parenting such children may significantly affect all domains of family functioning.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be due to the nature of CKD and its anticipated progression to ESRD and related premature mortality, in addition to worry about the efficacy, side effects of treatment, and comorbidities associated with CKD. This was consistent with results of studies in caregivers of children with nephrotic syndrome, one of the major causes of CKD in our children, who also reported the lowest score in worry function [28,30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This may be due to the nature of CKD and its anticipated progression to ESRD and related premature mortality, in addition to worry about the efficacy, side effects of treatment, and comorbidities associated with CKD. This was consistent with results of studies in caregivers of children with nephrotic syndrome, one of the major causes of CKD in our children, who also reported the lowest score in worry function [28,30].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…All individual domain scores, HRQOL score, family functioning, and total score were significantly lower compared to families with healthy children who had a mean score of 100. 12 Furthermore, the HRQOL score and total scores were comparable to families having children with developmental delays. 13 However, the family functioning mean score was higher in AAOCA families compared to those families with developmental delays (90 vs 82.3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Previous studies on the impact of NS on family health did not report this association; it was unclear from their methodologies whether caregivers of children in relapse were excluded. 7,10,18 Relapse may exert adverse psychosocial effects on the family via several mechanisms. First, it unpleasantly reminds caregivers that NS in the child is not cured yet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,17 Despite NS being a chronic relapsing condition in most children and the heavy reliance on caregiver’s input in the home management, few studies have examined the psychosocial well-being of caregivers of children with NS. 7,10,18 Indeed, the impact of NS on caregiver’s health has received relatively little attention compared with other chronic childhood illnesses. 19,20 We hypothesized that caregivers of children with NS suffer psychological distress and significant caregiver burden similar to those of children with other chronic illnesses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%