Multidimensional Highway Construction Cost Indexes Using Dynamic Item Basket

Abstract

A highway construction cost index (HCCI) is an indicator of the purchasing power of a highway agency. Thus, it must reflect the actual construction market conditions. However, current methods used by most state departments of transportation are not robust enough to meet this primary goal due to (1) a significantly insufficient sample size of bid items used in HCCI calculation; and (2) inability to address the need to track highway construction market conditions in specific submarket segments such as, but not limited to, various project types, sizes, and locations. This study proposes an advanced methodology to overcome these apparent limitations using two new concepts: (1) dynamic item basket; and (2) multidimensional HCCIs. The dynamic item basket process identifies and utilizes an optimum amount of bid-item data to calculate HCCIs in order to minimize the potential error due to a small sample size, which leads to a better reflection of the current market conditions. Multidimensional HCCIs dissect the state highway construction market into distinctively smaller sectors of interest and thus, allow state Departments of Transportation to understand the market conditions with much higher granularity. A framework is developed to integrate these two concepts and a standalone prototype system, named the Dyna-Mu-HCCI System, is developed to automate the dataprocessing part of the framework. The historical bid data of the Montana Department of Transportation are used to evaluate the performance of the Dyna-Mu-HCCI System and measure the effects of the dynamic item basket (DIB) and multidimensional HCCIs. The results show an eightfold increase in terms of the number of bid items used in calculating HCCIs and at least a 20% increase in terms of the total cost of bid items used. In addition, the multidimensional HCCIs reveal different cost-change patterns from different highway sectors. For example, the bridge construction market historically shows a very different trend compared with the overall highway construction market. The new methodology is expected to aid state Departments of Transportation in making more-reliable decisions in preparing business plans and budgets with more accurate and detailed information about the construction market conditions. Further, the prototype Dyna-Mu-HCCI System is expected to significantly facilitate the HCCI calculation process and rapidly implement this new system. highway agency. Thus, it must reflect the actual construction market conditions. However, 10 current methods used by most state departments of transportation are not robust enough to meet 11 this primary goal due to a) a significantly insufficient sample size of bid items used in HCCI 12 calculation and b) inability to address the need to track highway construction market conditions 13 in specific sub-market segments in terms of project type, size and location. This study proposes 14 an advanced methodology to overcome these apparent limitations using two new concepts: a) 15 dynamic item basket and b) multidimension...

A case study of PavMD a new tool to identify good performing pavements in New Zealand

“…Kuhn (2011) describes the limitations of using a discrete composite condition index and proposes that approximate dynamic programming can be used on large networks of pavements considering multi-dimensional condition data. Shrestha et al (2017) investigated multi-dimensional highway construction cost indices. They developed an automated system to calculate multi-dimensional cost indices for enhanced work efficiency instead of spread-sheet-based systems still common among state DOTs in the U.S. Khurshid et al (2014) used a multi-dimensional treatment methodology to evaluate five rigid pavement rehabilitation treatments.…”

Unpacking Ontological Perspectives in CEM Research: Everything Is Biased

“…Additionally, with the focus on quantitative data and analytical modeling, eight of the papers focus on bias introduced in forecasting values using specific analytical methods. These typically focused on bias introduced by selection of variables used to model forecasted values, such as cost estimates (Shrestha et al 2017) or in a specific variable, such as timing of business cycles (Kapelko and Abbott 2017).…”

Critical analysis for big data studies in construction: significant gaps in knowledge

“…Many of the studies have used regression models to predict construction tender prices, cost estimates and material price fluctuations (Cheng et al, 2009;Fallis, 2013;Lau et al, 2010;Narbaev and De Marco, 2014). Using a similar technique Shrestha et al (2017) used dynamic items basket (DIB) method, which 536 BEPAM 9,4 is based on regression modelling for large amount highway bid data to establish a framework for improved calculation process of Highway Construction Cost Index (HCCI).…”

“…Thus, an evidently proven case study analysis would help practitioners to see how big data could maximise competitive edge to stay on top of the market. Progress prediction model produced by Li (2017) and Shrestha et al (2017) is good examples of how big data improve estimation and bidding process. Again, how this index can be used to improve bidding success is an undiscussed area.…”

“…On what complex and dynamic ways big data facilitate these sharing economies is still unexplored. BDA supported by mobile technology with its geospatial capability adds a valuable dimension (Akhavian and Behzadan, 2015) that is already of great interest for real estate and building developers (Buffat et al, 2017;Shrestha et al, 2017). By understanding data and big analytical techniques, these businesses can better understand the current and future client demand and better target their new potential clientswhich is a massive implication for sectoral economy as a whole.…”