2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5003619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multidimensional effects on proton acceleration using high-power intense laser pulses

Abstract: Dimensional effects in particle-in-cell (PIC) simulation of target normal sheath acceleration (TNSA) of protons are considered. As the spatial divergence of the laseraccelerated hot sheath electrons and the resulting space-charge electric field on the target backside depend on the spatial dimension, the maximum energy of the accelerated protons obtained from three-dimensional (3D) simulations is usually much less that from two-dimensional (2D) simulations. By closely examining the TNSA of protons in 2D and 3D … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, in [29] by particle-in-cell simulations of target normal sheath acceleration of protons was obtained a proton spectrum (Figure 2e from reference) similar with that one from Figure 10. Optical images of the proton tracks identified on both front sides of the post-etched CR-39 detectors can be observed in Figure 8.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Laser Driven Proton Tracks In Cr-39 Detectormentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Recently, in [29] by particle-in-cell simulations of target normal sheath acceleration of protons was obtained a proton spectrum (Figure 2e from reference) similar with that one from Figure 10. Optical images of the proton tracks identified on both front sides of the post-etched CR-39 detectors can be observed in Figure 8.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Laser Driven Proton Tracks In Cr-39 Detectormentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Since the number and cutoff energy of TNSA protons are often overestimated in 2D simulations [7,51], we have also carried out full 3D simulations of the scheme. The 3D simulation result for the electron density at t = 473 fs is shown in figure 6(a).…”
Section: D Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we will briefly discuss the possible uncertainties resulting from the simplifications adopted in the laser-plasma interaction model used in our work, in particular resulting from: (a) the two-dimensionality of the model, (b) ignoring energy losses associated with bremsstrahlung radiation and (c) using the Sokolov model for simulation of SR emission. (a) It is well known that the results of numerical simulations of ion acceleration obtained using 2D PIC and 3D PIC codes may differ and the differences between these results depend on the laser and target parameters and the ion acceleration mechanism which dominates the acceleration process [63][64][65][66][67]. In the case of ion acceleration by the TNSA mechanism, 2D simulation overestimates the cut-off ion energy values (by a factor of ∼2 and sometimes even higher) compared to the energy values obtained from 3D simulation [63,64,66].…”
Section: Discussion Of Some Limitations Of the Computer Model Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) It is well known that the results of numerical simulations of ion acceleration obtained using 2D PIC and 3D PIC codes may differ and the differences between these results depend on the laser and target parameters and the ion acceleration mechanism which dominates the acceleration process [63][64][65][66][67]. In the case of ion acceleration by the TNSA mechanism, 2D simulation overestimates the cut-off ion energy values (by a factor of ∼2 and sometimes even higher) compared to the energy values obtained from 3D simulation [63,64,66]. One of the reasons is that in 3D simulation, the electron density in the electron sheath on the rear side of the target is lower than in 2D (the decrease in the density of the moving sheath due to transverse expansion is faster in 3D) and as a result, the electric field accelerating the ions is weaker.…”
Section: Discussion Of Some Limitations Of the Computer Model Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%