2017
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2016.2617896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multidimensional Convergence in Future 5G Networks

Abstract: Future 5G services are characterised by unprecedented need for high rate, ubiquitous availability, ultra-low latency and high reliability. The fragmented network view that is widespread in current networks will not stand the challenge posed by next generations of users. A new vision is required, and this paper provides an insight on how network convergence and application-centric approaches will play a leading role towards enabling the 5G vision. The paper, after expressing the view on the need for an end-to-e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A Fronthaul Aggregator (FHA) aggregates several such links from a cluster of RRUs and creates a Fronthaul Aggregated Link (FAL) which then connects to a centralized BBU pool, forming a tree-like network topology [14]. This abstract configuration could be implemented in practice with a Passive Optical Network (PON), by using a power splitter and Optical Line Terminal (OLT) as the fronthaul aggregator, with each RRU having an Optical Networking Unit (ONU) for communicating to the OLT [15]. It should be noticed that in general, a shared backhaul can provide substantial cost savings in dense cell deployments, as it allows to take advantage of statistical multiplexing across base stations.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A Fronthaul Aggregator (FHA) aggregates several such links from a cluster of RRUs and creates a Fronthaul Aggregated Link (FAL) which then connects to a centralized BBU pool, forming a tree-like network topology [14]. This abstract configuration could be implemented in practice with a Passive Optical Network (PON), by using a power splitter and Optical Line Terminal (OLT) as the fronthaul aggregator, with each RRU having an Optical Networking Unit (ONU) for communicating to the OLT [15]. It should be noticed that in general, a shared backhaul can provide substantial cost savings in dense cell deployments, as it allows to take advantage of statistical multiplexing across base stations.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, k M ) = 1 Therefore, the steady state probabilities of the aggregator can be obtained from (18). In this expression, the transition rates between different CPRI configurations λ i and µ i can be obtained from (12) - (15).…”
Section: Analysis Of M Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How these additional costs are apportioned across the services requiring the front hauling technology is a question that was beyond the scope of the DISCUS project and is a question for future projects [4]. Similarly the important question of whether the stringent front-hauling requirements on the fixed network could be relaxed further to increase reach and enable the lower cost and lower power consumption fixed network as described by the DISCUS architecture should also be properly addressed in future projects on 5G and beyond.…”
Section: Optical Access Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To facilitate the use of current front-hauling protocols, some electronic processing would therefore need to be provided at a large number of LE sites to terminate the limited reach front hauling systems [7]. Depending on the size and power consumption of this equipment it may not be possible to close all the LEs that the proposed DISCUS architecture could enable.…”
Section: End-to-end Network Design Andmentioning
confidence: 99%