2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multidimensional assessment of organizational performance: Integrating BSC and AHP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
93
0
12

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
93
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are many cases involving elements of interdependent and feedback relationships in decision-making problems; AHP cannot incorporate these connections [30]. Bentes, Carneiro, Silva, and Kimura [31] discuss the restrictions of an integration of BSC and AHP in the multidimensional assessment of organizational performance in a Brazilian telecom company. For example, there must be a hierarchical approach among the elements, assuming that there is no interaction between independent elements, or a sensitivity analysis cannot be performed to verify whether results are reasonably stable.…”
Section: Analytic Network Process (Anp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are many cases involving elements of interdependent and feedback relationships in decision-making problems; AHP cannot incorporate these connections [30]. Bentes, Carneiro, Silva, and Kimura [31] discuss the restrictions of an integration of BSC and AHP in the multidimensional assessment of organizational performance in a Brazilian telecom company. For example, there must be a hierarchical approach among the elements, assuming that there is no interaction between independent elements, or a sensitivity analysis cannot be performed to verify whether results are reasonably stable.…”
Section: Analytic Network Process (Anp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although BSC makes performance evaluation multidimensional, instead of focusing solely on financial criteria, items such as the massive amount of information needed and bias judgments make performance evaluation process complicated (Chan, 2006). To overcome the complexity of performance evaluation in BSC, the multicriteria decision-making techniques would be an appropriate tool (Bentes et al, 2012). On the other hand, given that BSC does not specify the relative importance of attributes, and according to the researchers inaccuracies and selective attention are the BSC characteristics, we use analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to fix this problem.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final score of performance in 2010 was calculated to be 95.88 percent. Bentes et al (2012) evaluated three functional units of an organization according to the BSC perspectives. They proposed a nine-stage algorithm for this purpose and defined appropriate subcriteria for each criterion in order to evaluate the performance of units.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If activity i has one of the above numbers assigned to it when compared with activity j, then j has the reciprocal value when compared with i Different studies based on Saaty's AHP theory, such as [9,34], explain that, if an alternative A i is preferable to an alternative A j , then the value of the comparison scale P c A i , A j = a ij indicates the intensity of relative importance of A i over A j , assigned by the decision maker. The scale allows, in a pairwise comparison, the investigator to establish which alternative is better.…”
Section: Reciprocalsmentioning
confidence: 99%