2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrnm.2013.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multidetector CT in pre- and post-operative evaluation of living-related liver transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study analysis reveals that MDCT has 100% sensitivity, 93.7% specificity in detecting the hepatic arterial anatomy; 100% sensitivity and specificity in detecting portal venous anatomy and its variants, and 93.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity in detecting hepatic venous anatomy. This is comparable to the findings reported by Elrakhawy et al 5 No statistically significant difference was found between CT volumetry and intraoperative findings by them. Compared to surgical findings, MDCT identified hepatic arterial and portal venous anatomy with 100% sensitivity and specificity, while for hepatic venous anatomy; it showed sensitivity and specificity of 85.7% and 84.2% in their study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Our study analysis reveals that MDCT has 100% sensitivity, 93.7% specificity in detecting the hepatic arterial anatomy; 100% sensitivity and specificity in detecting portal venous anatomy and its variants, and 93.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity in detecting hepatic venous anatomy. This is comparable to the findings reported by Elrakhawy et al 5 No statistically significant difference was found between CT volumetry and intraoperative findings by them. Compared to surgical findings, MDCT identified hepatic arterial and portal venous anatomy with 100% sensitivity and specificity, while for hepatic venous anatomy; it showed sensitivity and specificity of 85.7% and 84.2% in their study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%