The Netflix documentary Seaspiracy portrays serious issues driven by illegal and exploitative fishing, including stock collapse, habitat destruction, biodiversity loss, perverse subsidies, high seas crime, human labor abuses, and modern slavery. Certainly, an alarming number of fisheries remain overfished and exhibit these issues, particularly in places where industrialized fleets exploit waters that lack the capacity for management and enforcement (Worm et al. 2009). However, the film's omission of any success stories biases a documentary on overfishing into agenda-driven propaganda. Many scientifically assessed large stocks (e.g., in Iceland, New Zealand, USA, and Australia) are, in general, sustainably managed with effective fisheries governance (Worm et al. 2009;Costello et al. 2016). Modern management reforms have stabilized and/or recovered many high-profile stocks that were overfished (Winner et al. 2014). Today and throughout history, many small-scale community-based fishers have cooperatively managed their fisheries resources for generations, e.g., the Māori in New Zealand, the Khmer in Cambodia, and many American Pacific Northwest Indigenous societies (Lam 2015). Seaspiracy was thus heavily criticized by subject matter experts for its biases and lack of rigor (