2021
DOI: 10.1785/0120210104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicycle Simulation of Strike-Slip Earthquake Rupture for Use in Near-Source Ground-Motion Simulations

Abstract: Realistic dynamic rupture modeling validated by observed earthquakes is necessary for estimating parameters that are poorly resolved by seismic source inversion, such as stress drop, rupture velocity, and slip rate function. Source inversions using forward dynamic modeling are increasingly used to obtain earthquake rupture models. In this study, to generate a large number of physically self-consistent rupture models, rupture process of which is consistent with the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of stress produce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, with the growth in computational capabilities, the development of codes capable of handling complex topographies, and more high-quality near-surface geologic data available, it is becoming easier to directly model groundmotion amplification due to topography. Some studies that consider surface topography has obtained simulation results that are in good agreement with observed ground motions (Magnoni et al, 2013;Galvez et al, 2021;Wang et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…However, with the growth in computational capabilities, the development of codes capable of handling complex topographies, and more high-quality near-surface geologic data available, it is becoming easier to directly model groundmotion amplification due to topography. Some studies that consider surface topography has obtained simulation results that are in good agreement with observed ground motions (Magnoni et al, 2013;Galvez et al, 2021;Wang et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Dynamic rupture modeling across different fault or stress‐heterogeneity scales may use variable characteristic slip distances (Ando & Yamashita, 2007; Bizzarri & Cocco, 2003; Gallovič & Valentová, 2023; Galvez et al., 2021; Ide & Aochi, 2005; Ulrich et al., 2022). The critical nucleation size required to initiate spontaneous or runaway rupture (i.e., ruptures across the entire main fault (Galis et al., 2019)), scale with characteristic slip distance L under rate‐and‐state friction (Rubin & Ampuero, 2005), or with critical slip distance D c under linear slip‐weakening friction (Andrews, 1976; Day, 1982; Galis et al., 2015).…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that our analysis does not take highly complex rupture propagation effects into account such as, for example, multiple slip-episodes inferred from multiple timewindow slip inversion or in dynamic rupture scenario simulations informed from local strong ground motions (Galvez et al, 2016(Galvez et al, , 2020.…”
Section: Ure S9)mentioning
confidence: 99%