2000
DOI: 10.1080/713658797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiculturalism Reassessed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, those who support multiculturalism endorse the entitlement of ethnic minorities to equal rights at least in principle. This finding contrasts with results of previous research in European countries, where those who have a strong ethno-national identity are eager to reject the idea that ethnic minorities should maintain their cultures (Arends-Tó th and Van De Vijver 2003;Hjerm 2000;Verkuyten and Brug 2004). This difference in the results is based on the ethnic view of a nation in Japan.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, those who support multiculturalism endorse the entitlement of ethnic minorities to equal rights at least in principle. This finding contrasts with results of previous research in European countries, where those who have a strong ethno-national identity are eager to reject the idea that ethnic minorities should maintain their cultures (Arends-Tó th and Van De Vijver 2003;Hjerm 2000;Verkuyten and Brug 2004). This difference in the results is based on the ethnic view of a nation in Japan.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Public-opinion research has proved this assumption. Those who have weaker ethno-national identity are more likely to endorse multiculturalism (Arends-Tó th and van de Vijver 2003;Hjerm 2000;Sniderman and Hagendoorn 2007;Verkuyten 2006;Verkuyten and Brug 2004). This outlook can be explained by group threat theory, which assumes that ethnic exclusionism arises when ethnic majority members feel their privileged status is undermined by the subordinate group*ethnic minorities (Blumer 1958).…”
Section: The Conventional View: Multiculturalism Opposes Ethno-nationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most such studies, preferences for integration are expressed over the other three strategies (Berry, 2006). Integrative strategies seem to be preferred at a societal level (Hjerm, 2000), but there are subtleties (Arends-Toth & van de Vijver, 2003), and exceptions have been found in indigenous groups and in some cases in lower socioeconomic immigrant groups in some settings, for example Turks in Canada (Ataca & Berry, 2002). This raises the question as to why preference for integration in this cohort would not be associated with the best outcomes given that most studies in the acculturation literature have produced results pointing in this direction.…”
Section: Is Strong Cultural Alignment To the Original Culture Associated With Better Outcomes?mentioning
confidence: 91%
“… A 1993 Canadian public opinion poll found that almost 75 per‐cent of respondents rejected the idea that Canada is a ‘multicultural nation’ (Barry 2001: 293). For similar responses in other countries, see Betts (1996: 13) and Hjerm (2000: 366). …”
mentioning
confidence: 82%