1982
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.49.1565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicriticality of Wetting, Prewetting, and Surface Transitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

17
332
2
9

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 504 publications
(360 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
17
332
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Nakanishi and Fisher studied the "global phase diagram for wall and surface critical phenomena" [30]. Their work was a direct extension of that by Lubensky and Rubin, although leaning towards the context of binary fluid systems in contact with a surface.…”
Section: Simple Fluid Systemsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Nakanishi and Fisher studied the "global phase diagram for wall and surface critical phenomena" [30]. Their work was a direct extension of that by Lubensky and Rubin, although leaning towards the context of binary fluid systems in contact with a surface.…”
Section: Simple Fluid Systemsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…To avoid confusion, here we refer to the thin film phase as the vapor phase and retain the term of film phase for the thick film phase. For the static properties of wetting and prewetting transitions, most of the existing theoretical [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] and experimental [14][15][16][17] investigations have been focused on systems with the simplest geometry-infinite planar surface-and considerably less attention has been paid to systems of other surface geometries, e.g., finite and/or curved surfaces that deviate from the "ideal" case of planar substrate but are familiar in the real world. [18][19][20][21][22][23] For a fluid system in contact with a uniformly curved substrate, such as a cylinder or a sphere, the wetting transition, which would occur at an infinite planar surface, has been shown to be suppressed by the nonzero curvature and the finite size of the substrate, whereas the prewetting transition remains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to overcome these limitations and/or shortcomings, people have turned to the continuum description of fluid systems by free energy functional, from either the density-functional theory [4][5][6][7]22 or the ͑Landau͒ mean-field theory. [1][2][3]12,13,[18][19][20]23 In this description, the critical nucleus corresponds to a saddle point of the grand potential functional. Some earlier mean-field studies have been focused on systems on infinite planar substrates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[18][19][20] The water confined inside the film is the wetting phase, while the inner surface between the amphiphilic layers plays the role of the substrate in the usual WT systems. To establish the connection between NBF formation and wetting, we focus on the geometry of the water droplets inside the film, and on the role of the disjoining pressure to control the undersaturation of water with respect to its bulk liquid-vapor coexistence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%