2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2015.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicriteria group decision making with ELECTRE III method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information

Abstract: Available online xxx Keywords:Multiple criteria decision making ELECTRE III Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information Investment project selection a b s t r a c t A great number of real world problems can be associated with multicriteria decision making. These problems are often characterized by a high degree of uncertainty. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets are a generalized form of an ordinal fuzzy set to deal with this natural uncertainty. In this paper, an enhanced version of the ELECTRE met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
86
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most prevalent of these are Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) [24], Elimination and Choice Expressing Reality (ELECTRE) [25], Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) [26], VIseKriterijumska OptimizancijaI Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) [27], and many other methods such as Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE), Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) or Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Researchers can refer to [28] for more information about MCDM methods and a comparison between them.…”
Section: Best-worst Methodology (Bwm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most prevalent of these are Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) [24], Elimination and Choice Expressing Reality (ELECTRE) [25], Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) [26], VIseKriterijumska OptimizancijaI Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) [27], and many other methods such as Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE), Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) or Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Researchers can refer to [28] for more information about MCDM methods and a comparison between them.…”
Section: Best-worst Methodology (Bwm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outranking method facilitates comparison between alternatives by ascribing initial weights as part of a sensitivity analysis, if their exact value is not known. The comparison between alternatives is carried out on a pairwise basis and then the degree of dominance or outranking of one option over another is established [41,42].…”
Section: Multi-criteria Decision Making: Fuzzy Ahp-electre IIImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, there are three things to be done about the criteria used in the issues [18][19][20][21][22][23][24]:…”
Section: Application Of Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (Fahp) Formentioning
confidence: 99%