1997
DOI: 10.1080/09640569712137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multicriteria Group Decision-making Model for Environmental Conflict Analysis in the Cape Region, Mexico

Abstract: This paper is concerned with developing a model for group decision making under multiple criteria. The multiple criteria group decision making (MCGDM)problem involves a set of feasible land use patterns that are evaluated on the basis of multiple, conflicting and noncommensurate criteria by a group of individuals. The model integrates the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and an integer mathematical programming method. The former provides a tool for structuring the decision problem and determining land suitabil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
36
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have addressed GIS applications for marine aquaculture on site selection or spatial decision support. For instance, GIS has been adopted in marine aquaculture planning, and in various marine applications including sediment dynamics and bathymetry changes, artificial reef site selection, and coastal hazards [21][22][23][24]. Hence, GIS mapping involves detailed information, which requires a good data set of environmental indicators to determine the impact distance and risk assessment guidelines.…”
Section: Geographic Information System Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have addressed GIS applications for marine aquaculture on site selection or spatial decision support. For instance, GIS has been adopted in marine aquaculture planning, and in various marine applications including sediment dynamics and bathymetry changes, artificial reef site selection, and coastal hazards [21][22][23][24]. Hence, GIS mapping involves detailed information, which requires a good data set of environmental indicators to determine the impact distance and risk assessment guidelines.…”
Section: Geographic Information System Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17] developed a model to deal with a multicriteria group decision-making problem involving a set of feasible landuse options. The AHP was integrated with integer mathematical programming.…”
Section: Table 2 Application Of Ahp In Relevant Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Author/s and Country Application Area [8], USA Evaluation of strategies for the safe disposal of high-level nuclear waste [9], USA Fisheries management in Maryland"s river herring fishery [10], Finland Integration of biodiversity into forest management planning and decisionmaking [11], Finland Participative forest management planning of a nature conservation area [13], Canada Determining relative importance of risk factors for spruce beetle outbreaks [12], Finland Analyzing uncertainties in experts" opinions of forest plan performance [14], Spain Timber harvest scheduling problems with multiple criteria [15], Thailand Optimal crop planning for a groundwater irrigation project [17], Mexico Multicriteria group decision-making for environmental conflict analysis [18], Australia Ranking issues, projects and sites in integrated catchment management [19], Australia Pest plant prioritization process in weed management [8] Used AHP in comparing options for management of high-level nuclear waste, a complex decision problem involving many factors of a technological, environmental, social and political nature. They argued that there are many alternatives being proposed for the disposal of waste but, because of the lack of data, it is not an easy task to find the best alternative.…”
Section: Table 2 Application Of Ahp In Relevant Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a robust, ratio-scaled MCA method for analyzing complex decisions with multiple attributes (Saaty 1977). The AHP has been applied to elicit public preferences in a vast range of natural resource policy areas, including forest management (Schmoldt et al 2001, Mardle et al 2004, and was applied in multi-objective forest management for structuring and solving complex decision problems (Malczewski et al 1997, Kangas 1999, Vacik & Lexer 2001.…”
Section: Supporting Community Forestry In Nepalmentioning
confidence: 99%