Abstract:Different retrofitting measures can be implemented at different levels of the industrial furnace, such as refractory layers, energy recovery solutions, new burners and fuel types, and monitoring and control systems. However, there is a high level of uncertainty about the possible implications of integrating new technologies, not only in the furnace but also on the upstream and downstream processes. In this regard, there is a lack of holistic approaches to design the optimal system configurations under a multic… Show more
“…[58] CPS P, T +++ [68] Big Data P ++ + [69] Industry 4.0 P +++ [70] Cloud P ++ ++ [71] Big Data P ++ [72] CPS P +++ +++ [73] CPS P ++ ++ [74] Big Data T ++ ++ [75] Cloud, CPS, IoT P +++ ++ [76] Big Data P ++ [77] IAI, Big Data P ++ + [78] CPS P +++ ++ [79] CPS, VR, AR, IoT P ++ ++ [80] CPS P ++ [81] CPS P ++ [82] AM T [83] Industry 4.0 P ++ + [17] Big Data T + [84] Industry Big Data P ++ + [69] Industry 4.0 P +++ [70] Cloud P ++ ++ [71] Big Data P ++ [72] CPS P +++ +++ [73] CPS P ++ ++ [74] Big Data T ++ ++ [75] Cloud, CPS, IoT P +++ ++ [76] Big Data P ++ [77] IAI, Big Data P ++ + [78] CPS P +++ ++ [79] CPS, VR, AR, IoT P ++ ++ [80] CPS P ++ [ [68] Big Data P ++ + [69] Industry 4.0 P +++ [70] Cloud P ++ ++ [71] Big Data P ++ [72] CPS P +++ +++ [73] CPS P ++ ++ [74] Big Data T ++ ++ [75] Cloud, CPS, IoT P +++ ++ [76] Big Data P ++ [77] IAI, Big Data P ++ + [78] CPS P +++ ++ [79] CPS, VR, AR, IoT P ++ ++…”
The rapid development and implementation of digitalization in manufacturing has enormous impact on the environment. It is still unclear whether digitalization has positive or negative environmental impact from applications in manufacturing. Therefore, this study aims to discuss the overall implications of digitalization on environmental sustainability through a literature study, within the scope of manufacturing (product design, production, transportation, and customer service). The analysis and categorization of selected articles resulted in two main findings: (1) Digitalization in manufacturing contributes positively to environmental sustainability by increasing resource and information efficiency as a result of applying Industry 4.0 technologies throughout the product lifecycle; (2) the negative environmental burden of digitalization is primarily due to increased resource and energy use, as well as waste and emissions from manufacturing, use, and disposal of the hardware (the technology lifecycle). Based on these findings, a lifecycle perspective is proposed, considering the environmental impacts from both the product and technology lifecycles. This study identified key implications of digitalization on environmental sustainability in manufacturing to increase awareness of both the positive and negative impacts of digitalization and thereby support decision making to invest in new digital technologies.
“…[58] CPS P, T +++ [68] Big Data P ++ + [69] Industry 4.0 P +++ [70] Cloud P ++ ++ [71] Big Data P ++ [72] CPS P +++ +++ [73] CPS P ++ ++ [74] Big Data T ++ ++ [75] Cloud, CPS, IoT P +++ ++ [76] Big Data P ++ [77] IAI, Big Data P ++ + [78] CPS P +++ ++ [79] CPS, VR, AR, IoT P ++ ++ [80] CPS P ++ [81] CPS P ++ [82] AM T [83] Industry 4.0 P ++ + [17] Big Data T + [84] Industry Big Data P ++ + [69] Industry 4.0 P +++ [70] Cloud P ++ ++ [71] Big Data P ++ [72] CPS P +++ +++ [73] CPS P ++ ++ [74] Big Data T ++ ++ [75] Cloud, CPS, IoT P +++ ++ [76] Big Data P ++ [77] IAI, Big Data P ++ + [78] CPS P +++ ++ [79] CPS, VR, AR, IoT P ++ ++ [80] CPS P ++ [ [68] Big Data P ++ + [69] Industry 4.0 P +++ [70] Cloud P ++ ++ [71] Big Data P ++ [72] CPS P +++ +++ [73] CPS P ++ ++ [74] Big Data T ++ ++ [75] Cloud, CPS, IoT P +++ ++ [76] Big Data P ++ [77] IAI, Big Data P ++ + [78] CPS P +++ ++ [79] CPS, VR, AR, IoT P ++ ++…”
The rapid development and implementation of digitalization in manufacturing has enormous impact on the environment. It is still unclear whether digitalization has positive or negative environmental impact from applications in manufacturing. Therefore, this study aims to discuss the overall implications of digitalization on environmental sustainability through a literature study, within the scope of manufacturing (product design, production, transportation, and customer service). The analysis and categorization of selected articles resulted in two main findings: (1) Digitalization in manufacturing contributes positively to environmental sustainability by increasing resource and information efficiency as a result of applying Industry 4.0 technologies throughout the product lifecycle; (2) the negative environmental burden of digitalization is primarily due to increased resource and energy use, as well as waste and emissions from manufacturing, use, and disposal of the hardware (the technology lifecycle). Based on these findings, a lifecycle perspective is proposed, considering the environmental impacts from both the product and technology lifecycles. This study identified key implications of digitalization on environmental sustainability in manufacturing to increase awareness of both the positive and negative impacts of digitalization and thereby support decision making to invest in new digital technologies.
“…There are several approaches to define the retrofitting objectives to cope with that consideration, from an economic aspect, such as the life cycle cost (LCC) [177], or with maintenance and operational cost [178], [179], or life cycle assessment (LCA) in combination with the sustainable efficiency of a product process [147]. A variety of technical indicators, LCA, LCC, and the thermo-economic analysis, are studied in [180], to address the different effects of technologies that will be fused into the legacy system during the retrofitting work.…”
Section: B Second Phase: Identify Opportunities and Threats Define Vi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive multi-criteria analysis takes into consideration different priorities from the technical domain (i.e., saving Not Good (NG) product, increasing overall efficiency), environmental domain (i.e., reducing CO2 and NOx emission), economic domain (i.e., reducing operating and maintenance cost) is studied in Ref. [180]. The AHP method is applied to consider different retrofitting solutions for an aluminum furnace.…”
The ongoing Industry 4.0 is characterized by the connectivity between components in the manufacturing system. For modern machines, the Internet of Things is a built-in function. In contrast, there are legacy machines in deployment functioning without digital communication. The need to connect them became popular to improve overall production efficiency. As building a new smart factory as a greenfield investment is a capital-intensive choice, retrofitting the existing infrastructure with IoT capability is more reasonable than replacing them. However, this so-called brownfield development, or retrofitting, requires specific prerequisites, e.g., digitization status assessment, technical and connectivity development, management requirement, and operational need, representing a significant disadvantage: lack of scalability. In the meantime, Industry 5.0 is under human-centric priority, which poses new challenges to the retrofitted system. Aware of the challenge, this paper provides a systematic overview of brownfield development regarding technical difficulties, supporting technologies, and possible applications for the legacy system. The research scope focuses on available Industry 4.0 advancements but considers preparing for the forthcoming Industry 5.0. The proposed retrofitting project approach can be a guideline for manufacturers to transform their factories into intelligent spaces with minimal cost and effort but still gain the most applicable solution for management needs. The future direction for other research in brownfield development for Industry 5.0 is also discussed.
“…This KPI system, apart from the previously mentioned, will permit to give the assessment result in a global indicator that will be provided to the vineyard exploitation and/or wineries, to help them to make their sustainable efforts more visible to the market. The latter has been achieved by a multi-criteria decision-making method (MCDM) which facilitates the assessment of the three dimensions of sustainability in several industrial sectors [25,26]. This method is based on applying a multivariable complex decision process that results into the prioritisation of alternatives from the point of view of sustainability issues.…”
The present work introduces a multi-criteria approach focused on the evaluation of the wine production considering the three dimensions of sustainability, environmental, economic and social. Most relevant key performance indicators have been selected within each dimension and disaggregated into sub-indicators to address different sustainability aspects. The Analytic Hierarchy Process has been applied as the method to weight the relevance of the three dimensions and corresponding key performance indicators. Although the approach developed is specifically designed for the wine sector in the Navarrese region and therefore the key performance indicators selection could need an adjustment to adapt to the reality in other regions, results demonstrate how the approach proposed is able to identify, for both the vineyard and winery, the strengths, and weaknesses regarding the sustainability performance of them. Additionally, it also contributes to shed light on the most suitable and recommended actions to increase the company’s sustainability from sustainable perspective.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.