2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cose.2020.101895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiclass malware classification via first- and second-order texture statistics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6 shows the comparison between our model and recent work on the MalImg dataset. Experimental results show that our model has the same accuracy as that of in the literature [16], but other performance indicators are slightly lower than those in the literature [16]. Compared with other recent works, [14,15,42] our model has improved performance in malware family classification and robustness in classification imbalance.…”
Section: Malimg Datasetmentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 6 shows the comparison between our model and recent work on the MalImg dataset. Experimental results show that our model has the same accuracy as that of in the literature [16], but other performance indicators are slightly lower than those in the literature [16]. Compared with other recent works, [14,15,42] our model has improved performance in malware family classification and robustness in classification imbalance.…”
Section: Malimg Datasetmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…rough a set of discriminative patterns extracted from the visualized image of the malware, the malware is effectively divided into multiple families. In [16], based on the visual similarity between malware in the same family, a suggestion of directly performing binary texture analysis on gray-scale images of malware executable files was proposed. is technology derives a new combination of second-order statistical texture features based on the first-order and graylevel cooccurrence matrix (GLCM) on the visualized malware to perform confusion and unbalanced malware classification.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Verma et al [49] suggested using a combination of the first-order and grey-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM)-based second-order statistical texture features, which are classified using ensemble learning. The kernel-based ELM classifier was used for malware classification achieving 94.25% accuracy for the Malimg dataset.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since malware classification is a time-sensitive component in any anti-virus product, and a small delay could miss the best opportunity to discover malware processes, the procedure for distinguishing malware samples should take short time. We measured the CPU time of our dataset passing through VisMal during the test procedure and calculated the [39] in 2018, [40] in 2019, [31] in 2020, [41] in 2020, [30] 8.…”
Section: Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%