2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12555-021-0729-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiclass Classification Fault Diagnosis of Multirotor UAVs Utilizing a Deep Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yang et al [7] proposed a deep residual shrinkage network as a classifier using quadrotor state information (roll value, pitch value, roll rate, pitch rate, and yaw rate) and the four angular velocities of the propeller as input. Additionally, Park et al [5] used a stacked pruning sparse denoising autoencoder to process image inputs consisting of 20 signals with a length of 20 containing drone attitude, position, velocity, and acceleration information, and employed a CNN as a classifier. This approach exhibits good performance in noisy environments due to the denoising operation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yang et al [7] proposed a deep residual shrinkage network as a classifier using quadrotor state information (roll value, pitch value, roll rate, pitch rate, and yaw rate) and the four angular velocities of the propeller as input. Additionally, Park et al [5] used a stacked pruning sparse denoising autoencoder to process image inputs consisting of 20 signals with a length of 20 containing drone attitude, position, velocity, and acceleration information, and employed a CNN as a classifier. This approach exhibits good performance in noisy environments due to the denoising operation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, data-driven approaches, which operate in a model-free manner, have received increasing attention in recent years [4], [5]. These approaches utilize deep neural networks (DNNs) [6] to directly map sensor input to the results of the diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trained with real flight data, the classifier can perform accurate fault diagnosis on the test data collected from the same flights. Similarly, Park et al [5] proposed the stacked pruning sparse denoising auto-encoder for UAV fault diagnosis. Due to the use of denoising auto-encoder, the classifier performed well in the noisy scenario.…”
Section: A Data-driven Uav Fault Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with model-based approaches, the model-free methods do not rely on an system model. Among modelfree approaches, data-driven approaches [4], [5] have become increasingly popular in recent years. These approaches utilize flying data and fault labels to train a fault classifier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AFTCS is developed and implemented in hardware by Saied et al [18] for an octocopter UAV. However, a deep neural network-based fault detection algorithm is developed for the octocopter [19]. The crash probability density (CPD) is evaluated based on the Newton's laws, as well as Galileo's free fall for different types of UAVs using MATLAB simulation carried out in MATLAB in [20].To handle rotor failure in the quad-plane, a novel I-ASMC is proposed in [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%