2018
DOI: 10.1561/1700000059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multichannel Retailing: A Review and Research Agenda

Abstract: The emergence of multiple channels is reshaping consumers' purchase behavior and retailers' marketing styles. We synthesize existing research on multichannel retailing based on more than 150 articles published in peer-reviewed marketing journals, most after 2006. From this synthesis, we reveal conditions under which both consumers and retailers can benefit from a multichannel context. More specifically, we identify multichannel retailing as a winwin game contingent on market environments, retailer characterist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ailawadi and Farris (2017) argued that while the term 'multichannel retailing' focuses on managing and optimising the performance of each channel, 'omnichannel retailing' focuses on integrating activities within and across channels. However, these concepts are still used indistinctly in the context of retailers who sell products through their own offline and online channels (Ailawadi & Farris, 2017;Beck & Rygl, 2015;Liu, Lobschat, & Verhoef, 2018). Drawing on Lobschat and Verhoef (2018), this paper uses the term 'multichannel retailing' as an umbrella term to embrace all the different forms of multiple channel systems that can be found in retailing.…”
Section: Multichannel Retailingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ailawadi and Farris (2017) argued that while the term 'multichannel retailing' focuses on managing and optimising the performance of each channel, 'omnichannel retailing' focuses on integrating activities within and across channels. However, these concepts are still used indistinctly in the context of retailers who sell products through their own offline and online channels (Ailawadi & Farris, 2017;Beck & Rygl, 2015;Liu, Lobschat, & Verhoef, 2018). Drawing on Lobschat and Verhoef (2018), this paper uses the term 'multichannel retailing' as an umbrella term to embrace all the different forms of multiple channel systems that can be found in retailing.…”
Section: Multichannel Retailingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, prior research has studied whether online and offline channels are complementary or synergetic (e.g., Avery et al 2012;Deleersnyder et al 2002;Pauwels and Neslin 2015;Wang and Goldfarb 2017). In their synthesis of the literature, Liu, Lobschat, and Verhoef (2018) conclude that substantial channel differentiation may alleviate cannibalization occurring between similar channels (e.g., mobile and online channels). However, such differentiation also leads consumers to perceive lower consistency in the retailer's channel mix and a less seamless experience during multichannel shopping, which may reduce retailer performance.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, in spite of the rich extant literature on the multichannel construct (of which we give a thorough account in the next Sect. 2), and of a broad understanding of their determinants and implications, including the research shopping and channel synergy phenomena, several aspects of customer multichannel behaviours in the service industries (as opposed to the shopping of goods) still require further investigation (Liu et al 2018), while specific calls have been made for further studies considering channel choice decisions in multichannel environments, particularly aimed at investigating the interdependencies between the search and the purchase choices (Verhoef et al 2007). Compared to previous studies on multichannel shopping, this paper focuses specifically on the services industries and introduces a thorough classification of search patterns and a comprehensive set of customer behaviour determinants, specifically at the psychographic level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%