1999
DOI: 10.1109/78.806087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multichannel distance filter

Abstract: A nonlinear multichannel digital filter is presented in this correspondence. The output is a weighted sum of all samples in the filter window, with a single parameter controlling the filter nonlinearity. Although input data ordering is not required, performance can surpass the performance of other ordering-based multichannel filters.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we propose an application-driven vector ordering technique based on a spectral purity-based criterion, where each pixel vector in the hyperspectral image is ordered according to its spectral distance to other neighboring pixel vectors in the data. This type of ordering, which can be seen as a modification of the D-ordering available in the literature [ 18 ], has been found in previous work to be effective in capturing both spatial and spectral variability in hyperspectral data analysis [ 12 ]. An important ambiguity not sufficiently explored in previous work has to do with the fact that the ordering imposed above is not injective in general, i.e., two or more distinct vectors may output the same minimum or maximum distance.…”
Section: Multi-channel Mathematical Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we propose an application-driven vector ordering technique based on a spectral purity-based criterion, where each pixel vector in the hyperspectral image is ordered according to its spectral distance to other neighboring pixel vectors in the data. This type of ordering, which can be seen as a modification of the D-ordering available in the literature [ 18 ], has been found in previous work to be effective in capturing both spatial and spectral variability in hyperspectral data analysis [ 12 ]. An important ambiguity not sufficiently explored in previous work has to do with the fact that the ordering imposed above is not injective in general, i.e., two or more distinct vectors may output the same minimum or maximum distance.…”
Section: Multi-channel Mathematical Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard WD follows from (19) for the loss function F (e) = |e| 2 . The median form of the robust WD is obtained with F (e) = |e| [8], [18].…”
Section: B L-estimation Of the Wigner Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The robust WD can be derived from the minimization problem (19), with the loss function F (e) = |e|. It assumes the form [7] W D I (n, k) = γ(n, k) 41is an implicit definition of W D I (n, k).…”
Section: Appendix Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve ideal noise suppression and image detail preservation, weighted color vectors in stead of original ones are usually used in pixel ordering [46], [47] [48]. Adaptive vector filters, including adaptive nearest neighbor multichannel filters [49], fuzzy member functions based filters [50], multichannel distance filters [51], statistically computed neighborhood based filters [52], etc., in which the output is a weighted combination of all color vectors within the operation window, were also formulated. The key issue in this kind of nonlinear filters is optimal weight determination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%